all the information, none of the junk | biotech • healthcare • life sciences

Reinventing the Board Part III: The Agenda


(Page 2 of 2)

companies, people grow faster than their positions, so are often promoted; in startups, the company grows faster than the people, who often are forced to move into new roles. The board should always be looking ahead to which senior management jobs are changing and how they should be filled-not just the CEO, but at least one level below.

Market. Is the company in the right market? Is there a better one now available? Has the one the company is in left it behind? Should the company be selling directly or using channels?

Product/Service. Does the company really have the right product(s) or service(s), or is the management team listening too much to themselves and early adopters? What are the necessary sets of features and offerings to satisfy the market? Are there technological changes that could make the company’s offering(s) obsolete? Are there dependencies on suppliers or partners that make the company vulnerable?

Competition. How are competitive companies really doing and what should we do about it? Do we really understand their strategies and what is good about them? What potential competitive threats are on the horizon and can the company do anything now to ward them off?

Finance. Is the company’s financial profile the right one to be a successful and valuable organization in the market? Are its various financial ratios superior to its peers? Is it spending enough resources to grow at the appropriate pace? Is it harboring its resources appropriately? Is it creating enough absolute enterprise value to reward all its stakeholders, including customers, partners, employees, and investors.

Regulatory (optional). Are there coming regulatory changes that could affect the business? These include direct changes such as governmental oversight and compliance and indirect changes such as in trade, currency, and macroeconomic factors affecting sales or supply.

Third, the board should agree on the format of the meeting. There are several choices, depending on the questions and the best way to discuss them:

The Management Team Review—each group leader has a few to a dozen slides to showcase their area of expertise, such as sales, marketing, and development.

The CEO Visionary Pitch—only the CEO speaks to the board, giving a presentation about his/her vision for the company going forward, with the rest of the board commenting or reflecting on the proposal.

The Fireside Chat—no Powerpoint, just the agenda and maybe handouts of supporting data to discuss key questions and choices as a team. The CEO might not even offer a recommended strategy at that time, choosing to build consensus around main points first.

The Board Huddle—several or each of the board members prepares materials for a portion of the meeting based on their expertise or fresh perspective. This approach is particularly useful for questioning assumptions and taking a fresh look at a marketplace.

Executive Session–-the board meets without management team members to review the company’s performance and prospects. Executive compensation is often a key feature of this meeting.

Each of these formats also can be effectively combined with one or two others. Two of my portfolio companies, Vela Systems and Apperian, regularly start each meeting in the fireside chat format for 15 to 30 minutes, switch to management team review for another hour, and close with 15 to 30 minutes of executive session. The varied format draws out different perspectives and participants on issues facing each company.

Single PageCurrently on Page: 1 2 previous page

James Geshwiler is Managing Director at CommonAngels Ventures. He joined CommonAngels in 1999 and has been an active investor in mobile, cloud, consumer and business software as well as digital media companies. [Editor's note: CommonAngels is the lead investor in Xconomy.] Follow @geshwiler

Trending on Xconomy

By posting a comment, you agree to our terms and conditions.

Comments are closed.