Milwaukee Has Startup Ecosystem Elements, Awaits Chain Reaction
(Page 2 of 2)
cause the chain reaction to start. It requires work and support to kick it off. Many of these elements must be started individually, and often with great expense and effort.
Milwaukee vs. Boston
Obviously Boston (and the Bay Area) have all these elements in abundance, and the critical mass and chain reaction are in full swing. It didn’t happen overnight, but over decades. And now it can actually be overwhelming to get a handle on all the elements in play and almost impossible for startups to get noticed in the fray.
But the East and West Coasts are exceptional and may not be the best examples for a young startup community to compare itself to. It would be like trying to become a good basketball player by only comparing yourself to NBA stars. It’s nice to know what is possible, but it can be misleading and demoralizing to think that’s what you have to be to be successful.
My experience in Milwaukee is far more limited than my experience with Boston, but I feel I have a good handle on what is happening in the area. And I like what I see.
The startup community in Milwaukee has really blossomed in the two years I have been back. Startup support groups and accelerators have been growing; more people interested in startups are coming to meet-ups; more investors are getting involved in younger companies; government is taking an interest; big companies are willing to consider becoming customers of startups; and startups are actually getting some traction and generating revenue.
Something big and exciting is under way, and we need to keep it going. Initial successes will take awhile, and the community as a whole needs to understand this and not expect to get “the next Facebook” overnight.
Milwaukee hasn’t hit the critical mass to trigger the chain reaction yet. It’s moving in that direction, but a sustained effort is needed. I see no reason why it can’t be done if people are willing to stick with it, be encouraged by incremental progress, and realize it won’t happen quickly.
Below are a few changes in the local collective attitude that I’d like to see more of:
—There are a lot of people coming straight out of school wanting to start companies. While this is not necessarily a bad thing, Milwaukee needs to have more experienced people launching companies. It is not enough to have a cool idea. A company needs to be founded on solving a problem a customer will pay you for.
Veteran workers know which issues exist in the industry in which they have experience—and what it takes to fix them. They have management experience and have broader networks to tap. The “start a company in a weekend” and “become an entrepreneur in a few months” programs might be fun experiences, but I think they can set some harmful expectations about how quickly success in a startup can happen.
Just as useful is getting experience working in other startups. If you are interested in launching your own company, I highly recommend working for a while in the “real world” or at another startup.
—The large companies in Milwaukee need to relax their “not invented here” attitudes and consider that working with a startup might be a very cost-effective way to solve strategic problems.
Often a startup can provide access to a team of talented individuals that would not consider working at a large organization. They will often work harder because it is for them as much as for the customer.
Large companies need to understand how to work with a startup doing custom development as opposed to contract work. View the partnership as helping them develop a product you need, not paying them to complete a project you fund and own. It works, and everyone benefits.
—Investors in the Milwaukee area need to relax their risk preferences a little. There is a pretty strong tendency to only want to invest in companies that are already generating revenue from existing products with a solid business model. While this is a safe strategy, it will almost never result in the big win. And it won’t get many big-growth tech companies off the ground.
Knowing how to take more risk in a principled way requires knowing more about the markets. Attending pitch meetings and hoping some fully formed company with little risk comes in is too passive. Active interaction with, coaching of, and learning from the community will allow investors to get in on deals earlier and more safely—and get bigger returns.