Even though the sun was finally out in Seattle, dozens of folks from the worlds of cleantech, life sciences and high tech got together to share thoughts and network at Xconomy’s latest event, “Separating Hype from Reality in Alternative Fuels.”

Our panelists and presenters dove into the past and future of biofuels, the need for balanced public policy, the promise and reality of electric vehicles, how the Pacific Northwest can drive innovation in airline fuels, and much more.

For a recap of the major themes touched on by our panelists, you can check out my wrapup of Thursday night’s discussion. We’ve also put together this photo gallery of some sights from the program, captured by Vinh Chung of Total Effects Video.

We also must thank our underwriters, partners and sponsors, without whom our events wouldn’t be possible. The Institute for Systems Biology was the host, the Washington Clean Technology Alliance was our partner, and Mixtur was our design sponsor.

Our valued underwriters were Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Christensen O’Connor Johnson Kindness, Cooley, Davis Wright Tremaine, Fenwick & West, Graham & Dunn, the ISB, Invest Northern Ireland, J. Robert Scott, Kauffman Foundation, Latham & Watkins, the Science and Technology Directorate of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Seed IP Law Group, and Swedish Medical Center.

And our venture capital members for this event were ARCH Venture Partners, Vulcan Capital, and WRF Capital.

Comments | Reprints | Share:          

We had a great time at our latest Xconomy Seattle event, “Separating Hype from Reality in Alternative Fuels,” held last night at the new Institute for Systems Biology headquarters in Seattle’s South Lake Union neighborhood.

The presenters sketched some meaty ideas about the drive to develop oil alternatives, challenged a bit of conventional thinking, and got the audience to dive in with great follow-up questions. Here are a few of the big themes that emerged as Luke moderated the main discussion with Ned David and Kristina Burow of Arch Venture Partners—two of the co-founders of San Diego-based Sapphire Energy—and Margaret McCormick, the co-founder and CEO of Seattle-based Matrix Genetics. If you want to see some images from the event, check out this Flickr gallery from Vinh Chung of Total Effects Video.

—Biofuels 3.0: David pointed to the U.S.’s last two attempts to develop biofuels—after the 1970s energy crunch and in the mid-2000s, when national policy ramped up the production of ethanol. Neither of those eras, of course, have delivered much in the way of energy independence.

David said the 1970s saw the first big effort to cultivate algae as an alternative fuel source, but that fell short because the technology wasn’t advanced enough to get results. That wrongly led many to believe that algae wouldn’t work, he said.

The ethanol boomlet of the past decade was the 2.0 wave of biofuels for this country, but that hasn’t produced anything like what all those optimistic politicians pledged at the outset. “Forty percent of the U.S. corn crop goes to replacing 8 percent of our transportation fuel,” Burow said. “That is not sustainable.”

At present, David said, we’re in the 3.0 phase of U.S. biofuels. Algae was a big focus of this particular discussion, since all three of our panelists have direct experience with that field. With projects like Sapphire Energy’s drive to put a huge algae-fuel production facility in the Mexican desert, you’re seeing “the first building blocks of world-scale capability” for these fuels.

“I think that microorganisms can solve most of the problems of the world. If you go back, it was alcohol or it was cheese,” McCormick said. “There’s so much potential that can be harnessed out of these microorganisms and the DNA that’s in them, and we can look at them to solve all kinds of problems.”

—High stakes, but no quick fixes: McCormick said the latest phase of alternative fuels work is not purely driven by an economic need to reduce spending on oil, but is also by the need to address climate change and national security issues.

Burow added a fourth factor: “This has got to work. By 2020, we’ll have increased our need for energy by 40 percent as a world. And there’s simply no way to meet that increase without these types of alternative fuels.”

At the same time, Burow said, the cycle for developing such culture-shifting technologies is still much slower than we expect from other areas of innovation. “This isn’t Twitter. This isn’t … Next Page »

Comments (4) | Reprints | Share:          

If you haven’t heard about Ann Marie Sastry by now, then maybe you’ve been spending too much time (and money) pumping gas into your internal combustion engine.

The University of Michigan professor has won plenty of kudos and cash for her efforts to develop a solid-state lithium ion battery for next generation electric cars. Her startup, Ann Arbor, MI-based Sakti3, has attracted big-name investors like General Motors, Beringea, and Khosla Ventures.

Now Sastry can add one more coat of gloss to her already bright star. MIT Technology Review named Sastry’s battery as one of the year’s top ten emerging technologies.

In its May/June issue, the publication says Sakti3 could revolutionize electric cars by packing more energy into a battery that occupies much less space under the hood than existing batteries.

“If electric and hybrid vehicles are to account for more than a small percentage of vehicles on the road, cheaper and better batteries are needed,” Stephen Cass, special project editor at MIT Tech Review, said in a statement. “Sakti3 could deliver the needed breakthrough by focusing on ways to economically mass-produce a new type of battery-a so-called solid-state battery-that can safely store more energy than a traditional lithium-ion battery, which would reduce the cost of electric and hybrid vehicles and extend their range.”

In compiling its list, MIT Tech Review says it has just one criterion: “is the technology likely to change the world?”

That seems fitting since Sastry likes to think globally.

I had the chance to size her up at Xconomy’s Michigan 2031 forum last week in Detroit. Beyond her obvious intelligence and poise, what struck me most about Sastry was her confident embrace of big ideas and big ambitions.

Whether it’s Midwest modesty or the weak economy, Michigan today seems to lack visionaries who think world first and local second. Not so with Sastry.

“If you have world-class technology, then you find the best people to work with, people who know what the hell they’re doing because you know what the hell you’re doing,” Sastry told the forum. “If you’re good at what you do, then good people will want to join you. Don’t be afraid to look for world-class people.”

Comments (3) | Reprints | Share:          

Who Killed The Electric Car? Hopefully not me.

As I surveyed the commotion at the Environmental Protection Agency’s National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory in Ann Arbor Monday morning, I couldn’t help but think of that documentary for a couple of reasons.

One, I was just about to test drive one of the next-generation electric cars developed by college students across North America. Let’s just say my driving skills are…uh…a little suspect and I didn’t want to wreck some poor kid’s research project, at least not before it got graded.

Secondly, I appreciated the irony of the moment. Released in 2006, Who Killed The Electric Car? argued that the federal government had conspired with auto manufacturers and oil companies to derail the nascent battery-powered electric car industry.

Five years later, two of those alleged conspirators have joined forces to sponsor a three-year competition for American and Canadian college students to create the very cars they supposedly plotted to destroy. General Motors, based in Detroit, provided vehicles and cash to the students while the EPA and the U.S. Energy Department offered research, technical, and logistical help.

Things have sure changed since 2006. Faced with rising oil prices and political instability in the Middle East, President Obama has made developing electric cars a centerpiece of his national energy strategy.

“With more research and incentives, we can break our dependence on oil with biofuels, and become the first country to have a million electric vehicles on the road by 2015,” Obama told Congress during his State of the Union address in January.

But more importantly, electric cars have leap frogged from novelty to reality. Judging from the buzz surrounding the Ford Focus and Chevy Volt, consumers today actually want to buy American-produced electric cars.

Which is why GM invested so heavily in this EcoCAR competition, says Kent Helfrich, the company’s … Next Page »

Comments (3) | Reprints | Share:          

When Xconomy Detroit launched in April 2010, I wrote that this city is a verb, in a constant state of action, of “becoming,” of striving for something greater. Having lived in Michigan for much of my life, I can say that this was true even in good times, and certainly even more so in bad.

I think we launched Xconomy Detroit at just the right time, because this year has been one filled with stirrings toward another period of great change. It might still be fashionable to bash Michigan if you do not live here, but those who stayed can really feel something new beginning. It is not only Midwestern stoicism at work, but something more concrete.

I’ve written about Michigan for Xconomy and other publications for decades now and can feel that 2010 marked the beginning of something brand new. Here are what I believe are the Top 10 reasons for optimism this year.

Batteries

Jennifer Granholm, Michigan’s outgoing governor, deserves a great deal of credit for working toward her vision of the state as a center for battery innovation and manufacturing. Batteries will not replace the jobs lost in the automotive industry as a whole, but she recognized early on that Michigan has the engineering know-how and manufacturing infrastructure to attract and retain companies developing and making the lithium-ion batteries that will be crucial to Auto Industry 2.0.

In 2010, her proselytizing — and creation of tax incentives — seemed to pay off, with A123 Systems, Compact Power, Johnson Controls, Dow Chemical, and TSC Michigan all either opening or announcing new lithium-ion battery plants in Michigan. Also, ALTe, developer of electric propulsion systems, opened a new plant in Auburn Hills, MI, and longer-range battery developer Sakti3, based in Ann Arbor, waiting in the wings while attracting venture capital funds

Michigan has competition from surrounding states in battery manufacturing, but Granholm’s efforts made sure that the Great Lakes State will remain an important player. Now, of course, consumers will have to actually start buying those electric cars.

Venture Capital

Michigan entered 2010 with some pretty dismal VC numbers, in terms of numbers of firms and dollars invested, even during a dismal time for venture capital in general. The only good thing that was … Next Page »

Comments (2) | Reprints | Share:          

Ten years ago the electric car seemed to be the wave of the future. But in those days of peace and cheap gas, consumers weren’t really demanding the technology. Today that problem has been turned on its ear, as clean energy vehicles are popping up on the factory floor of most major car companies, each vying to tap into an emerging wave of demand for clean, green automobiles.

With the resurgence of the electric car, many are wondering, could it save our floundering American car companies? The industry has gone through a wrenching transformation in this economic downturn, seeing a free fall in demand from the traditional U.S. consumer. Automakers sold about 17 million cars a year in the U.S. during the peak years of 1999 to 2007, but now demand for new cars shrank to just 10 million in 2009.

Many people consider the 2011 Chevy Volt, an electric vehicle, to be the next great hope for the future of Detroit-based General Motors. On Saturday, I was one of the lucky few to get a chance to actually drive one, I hopped behind the wheel at Griot’s Garage in Tacoma. Griot’s was the first stop on the Volt’s “Volt Unplugged” tour, a 3,400-mile, 12-city cross-country caravan orchestrated by GM to showcase the electric car’s extended range capabilities.

When I got to the auto shop’s garage, there were two Volts—one painted in steel grey, the other in black—waiting to be driven out on the road. Four others were already out, being taken for a spin by other members of the local media.

What makes the Volt unique, is that at first glance—with both an electric engine and gas-powered generator—it sounds like a hybrid. But it’s not. The Volt is in fact equipped with both electric and gas power sources, but does not run the same way that a hybrid might. The car’s 16kWh battery powers the vehicle for 25 to 50 miles, after which the “extended range” capabilities take over, and the gas-powered generator is used to recharge the electric battery. The more efficiently you drive, the more energy is recycled back into powering the car.

“It’s more like an electric locomotive,” says General Motors communications representative Alan Alder. “Even the brake harnesses the kinetic energy of braking to regenerate the battery.”

The first 25 to 50 miles (a variable that depends on terrain, temperature, battery age, and driving technique) are powered without using any gas, and has no emissions. Consumers who use the Volt to drive 50 miles a day or less, according to Chevy, would save approximately 500 gallons of gas a year.

“For the average commuter that drives 40 miles a day,” says Alder. “They will never use a drop of gas.”

It takes between eight and 10 hours to fully charge a depleted battery using a basic 120-volt outlet, and around between three and five hours on a 240-volt charger. (If you live in Washington state and your electricity is run by hydropower, even charging up the car is emission-free). With a full charge and a full tank of gas the Volt can run for approximately 350 miles straight, and has a maximum speed of 100 miles per hour.

When I got behind the wheel of the black Volt with Alder and my “photographer” for the day, Sam Speer, my boyfriend (credit Sam for the pictures) to take it for a spin, the first thing I noticed was the noise—or lack of it. The silence was so unnerving, I checked to make sure the Volt was in fact turned on several times before easing out of the garage (there were cameras filming after all, and I’d vowed to myself when I agreed to the test-drive that I would not make the blooper roll). I immediately pressed … Next Page »

Comments (5) | Reprints | Share:          

Most of the local tech deals we’ve seen recently have involved strategic partnerships, rather than financings. Over the last week, two big Internet and software players made some strides in a search partnership that was over a year in the making, a couple of partnerships were forged in the clean energy space, and a local online startup offered to buy up a popular website from a big-time media company. Take a look at the highlights.

—After more than a year of partnership negotiations between Yahoo (NASDAQ: YHOO) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), and months of transitional work, Yahoo’s English search in the U.S. and Canada is now fully powered by Microsoft’s Bing. The ten-year, $150-million agreement finalized last July puts Microsoft in charge of search engine technology for both companies, and Yahoo in charge of sales and distribution of advertising for both search engines.

—The City of Seattle teamed up with the Ford Motor Company, based in Dearborn, MI, to prepare the city for a future that will presumably feature more electric vehicles, which place new demands on the electrical grid. The partnership, part of Ford’s 14-city “Charging into the Future Tour,” includes consumer outreach and education programs to introduce the community to electric cars, as well as joint work with local and state governments on issues surrounding permitting, regulations, and legislation, such as tax incentives to support electric vehicle purchases.

—Renton, WA-based Quantum Engineering and Development agreed to be acquired by Framingham, MA-based energy-efficiency services company Ameresco (NYSE: AMRC). Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed. Quantum, which provides energy and water auditing, engineering, construction, and commissioning services for public, commercial, and industrial customers, will be joining Ameresco’s 650-person staff here in the Northwest as part of the company’s expansion efforts in the region.

—For the second week in a row Seattle-based I Can Has Cheezburger has made the deal roundup list without actually inking a deal, financing round, or partnership. This week the humor network’s CEO Ben Huh jumped into a debate between user-generated news aggregation site Reddit, and its parent organization Condé Nast, surrounding Condé Nast’s refusal to post advertisements in support of California’s Proposition 19, which would legalize marijuana for individuals 21 and older, on the site. Joining in on one of his own sites, The Daily What, Huh offered to buy Reddit from Condé Nast and incorporate it into the Cheezburger family.

—This also isn’t exactly a deal, but it does speak to the financing climate for regional startups both in tech and biotech. In our monthly roundup of all industry deals in the Pacific Northwest last week, we took a look at the local financing figures for July, compared them to June’s figures, and found some interesting trends. In July local Washington companies brought in $81.7 million in financing, down from $104.3 million the month before.  $62.5 million out of the $81.7 million went to the healthcare sector.

Comments (1) | Reprints | Share:          

The City of Seattle and Dearborn, MI-based Ford Motor Company have teamed up to prepare the city for the operation of electric vehicles, the automaker said today. The partnership will include the joint development of consumer outreach and education programs on electric cars, as well as collaboration on information regarding charging requirements of electric vehicles to ensure the grid is prepared to support the added demand. The two organizations will also work with state and local governments on issues of permitting, future regulations and legislation, and raising support for electric vehicle tax incentives. The collaboration is part of Ford’s 14-city “Charging into the Future Tour,” which kicked off in Portland, OR earlier this week.

Comments (5) | Reprints | Share:          

Three Michigan companies have received a combined $140,000 through the Michigan Microloan Fund program, managed by the Ann Arbor SPARK business incubator. This latest round means the program has invested a total of more than $1.4 million in 39 companies since it was started in July 2009.

Microloans range from $10,000 to $50,000 and are reserved for privately held companies based in Michigan.

The latest grant recipients are:

Detroit Electric: The Detroit-based developer of electric cars will use the loan to “provide some important necessities during the early stages of our expansion in the United States,” Albert Lam, Detroit Electric founder and chairman, says in a news release.

Ergun Technologies: Based in TechArb, the University of Michigan student incubator, Ergun develops a system called Own, which gives retail operation owners real-time remote access to all their stores’ cash registers. The company is aiming to reach the major coffeehouse microchains in Michigan with its Web-based point of sale system.

Local Orbit: Based in Ann Arbor, Local Orbit simplifies the process of buying food directly from local farmers for restaurants, institutions, and consumers. Erika Block, founder and CEO, says in a statement that the loan will enable the company to hire a full-time community manager and invest in software development.

Comments | Reprints | Share:          

It was a busy week for cleantech news. Local biofuels executives talked about their collaborative partnerships with big energy companies, and Vista, CA-based Aptera disclosed why it has pared back on some operations. Read all about it here.

—Aptera, the Vista, CA-carmaker, said it has delayed production of its all-electric Aptera 2e that once was to begin in the fall of 2009. In a statement, the company said, “We’ll begin volume production vehicles once our current series of private funding has closed or when we secure financing through the Department of Energy’s Advanced Technology Vehicle loan program, whichever comes first.”

—Global Analytics Holdings, a San Diego company founded by Krishna Gopinathan, has raised $10 million of a targeted $14 million round. Gopinathan, who was the primary inventor of the Falcon Fraud Manager that’s now part of Fair Isaac, started Global Analytics to develop software for statistical analysis, predictive modeling, and neural networks.

—Collaborative partnerships with big energy companies are a crucial way for startup biofuel companies to advance their technologies and expand their business operations. At a Biocom forum, HR BioPetroleum CEO Edward Shonsey explained how his startup established a joint venture in 2007 with Royal Dutch Shell. But even with its partnership, HR BioPetroleum has had a hard time securing financing, as COO Martin Sabarsky told Voice of San Diego.

—Sony Ericsson plans to close six offices worldwide, including one in San Diego, as it consolidates its operations and moves its North American headquarters from Research Triangle Park, NC, to Atlanta.

—Ellen Pao, a partner and member of the GreenTech investment team at Menlo Park, CA-based Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, said one of the hottest areas for technology innovation and investment is the electric power grid. As she put it, “We use a lot of energy, and we waste a lot of energy.”

—Carlsbad CA-based Verdezyne, which has re-engineered its business strategy to focus on the “green design” of biofuels and industrial chemicals, is working to re-engineer a particular strain of yeast so that it makes ethanol much more efficiently. The company, which now has 26 employees, also has identified a key market for its technology in industrial chemicals.

—Leonard Pool is seeking venture capital to expand his nine-year-old company, Sidus Solutions, which specializes in deep underwater camera and surveillance technologies for the maritime industry. Sidus Solutions is representative of a cottage industry in San Diego that is focused on marine technologies.

Comments | Reprints | Share:          

The President of the United States is supposed to know the differences between Sunni and Shia Muslims. But somehow, as Richard Muller points out, nobody expects America’s commander in chief to know the differences between uranium and plutonium, or between gasoline and hydrogen.

That’s why he teaches “Physics for Future Presidents” at UC Berkeley, a course for non-science majors that Muller relishes as his opportunity to inform the business majors and liberal arts students who represent our future leaders. The longtime Cal physics professor turned his idea for the class into a textbook, and more recently into a popular book with the same title.

Now he’s on a roll. Muller was the featured speaker at Xconomy’s premiere event in San Diego Monday night, just a week or so after meeting with global leaders at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland (He even got to fly home aboard the Google jet).

With “Physics for New Presidents” as his theme, Muller assumes a role that could be described as an equal opportunity “Debunker in Chief.” In rapid succession, he separates some core, inescapable scientific truths from the myths surrounding them. He started by dispelling fears sown by Dick Cheney about terrorists planting nuclear bombs on U.S. soil and ended by puncturing Al Gore’s inflated interpretations of the scientific evidence for global warming. Among the chestnuts he shucked:

—Nuclear bombs are extremely difficult to make, even for industrialized countries. Muller says he’s far more worried about another “low tech” terrorist act involving 60 tons of gasoline and a crowded football stadium on a Sunday afternoon.

—U.S. reserves of coal and oil shale far exceed the amount of crude oil remaining in Saudi Arabia and most other countries combined. “This is great news for energy independence and bad for global warming,” Muller says. Nevertheless, he says the United States should develop all of its energy resources, using “clean coal” technologies and other innovations to curb greenhouse gas emissions.

—The scientific consensus, presented by an authoritative study on global warming by the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change, concluded that the warming trend from 1850 to 1957 cannot be attributed to human activities. From 1957 to 2007, the study found a 90 percent likelihood that human activities caused a global average temperature increase of only about 1 degree Fahrenheit.

—Weather data do not show an increase in the number of hurricanes over the past century, nor do the data show an increase in the number of major category hurricanes. Today, hurricanes are detected by weather satellites and sensors in mid-ocean. Such observations were impossible before the first weather satellite was launched 49 years ago.

—Carbon dioxide emissions in developing countries, especially China and India, represent the biggest source of the predicted increase in greenhouse gases. It is a far more intractable problem in terms of curbing emissions, because coal is a cheap and bountiful energy source and clean energy technologies are too costly in comparison. “The only solution that I can think of is that we have to pay developing countries to use clean energy,” Muller says. Otherwise, they won’t use it.

As for energy development in the United States, Muller says his counsel is, “Don’t be greener than thou. Don’t bicker that ‘My technology is greener than yours. ‘ We need all of them. We need clean coal. We need nuclear. We need solar and wind. We need them all.”

Comments | Reprints | Share:          

We’re looking forward to seeing you today at Xconomy’s San Diego premiere, an entertaining and eye-opening presentation on Physics for Future Presidents by UC Berkeley’s Richard A. Muller. Online registration for the event, which is here, closes at noon and walk-in registrations begin at 3:30 pm The presentation begins at 4 pm—hope to see you there!

Comments | Reprints | Share:          

If President Obama ever has a question about the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs, he can just pick up his Presidential Blackberry and call or e-mail Secretary of Energy Steven Chu, the Nobel Prize-winning physicist.

Of course, the President of the United States could just as easily call Richard A. Muller—the U.C. Berkeley professor who literally wrote the book on Physics for Future Presidents. He also was a leading member of the Berkeley team that theorized how an asteroid killed the dinosaurs. Now Xconomy has tapped Muller and his talent for eye-opening explanations as the featured speaker at our San Diego premiere event. We are hosting the MacArthur “genius” award-winning physicist as the inaugural speaker for our Xconomy Forums here, to be held Monday at 4 p.m. at UCSD’s Institute of the Americas Complex. If you’re interested in attending, you can register here.

The book Physics for Future Presidents grew out of Muller’s popular class for non-science majors at Cal—which was voted “The Best Class at Berkeley” last year in a readers’ poll by the student newspaper, The Daily Californian. Muller’s book and lectures have gained renown for explaining the important science underlying terrorism, energy, electric cars, nukes, space, and global warming—and for empowering our electorate with a better understanding of science and technology.

Please join us Monday afternoon to hear this engaging presentation by one of the foremost speakers on science and technology. I hope to see you there.

Comments (1) | Reprints | Share:          

The United States will have a new president in four days. But if it were you, how should science and technology guide you in making key decisions in areas like energy, the environment, and fighting terrorism? Should we invest heavily in solar power or electric cars? What is the real potential of nuclear technology—either as a terrorist weapon or as a clean energy savior? How much do we really have to worry about global warming, or do we really even know yet?

These are just some of the issues that will be addressed in our San Diego site’s first Xconomy Forum: Physics for Future Presidents—which will be held on Feb. 9 at 4 p.m. on the University of California, San Diego campus. The speaker is renowned U.C. Berkeley physicist and MacArthur “genius” grant winner Richard A. Muller, author of a best-selling new book of the same name. The book, in turn, is based on his course for non-science students, which was voted the most popular class on the Cal campus.

Rich is an old friend of mine; I first met him when working on a cover story for Time magazine about how an asteroid or comet might have led to the extinction of the dinosaurs. He was one of the core team, along with Luis Alvarez and others at Berkeley, who advanced that theory and changed our view of our planet’s history. Rich is one of the world’s most original, and provocative, science and technology thinkers, and we are pleased to have him join us for our debut San Diego event.

And if you think you already know the answers to some of the questions posed above, be prepared to be surprised, even amazed, by Rich’s arguments—this is a man who doesn’t put much stock in conventional wisdom or the party line. All of which could—and we hope will—make for some lively debate during Rich’s talk, which begins at 4 pm (doors open at 3:30) in the Hojel Auditorium in UCSD’s Institute of the Americas Complex. And you’ll have ample chance to continue the discussion, and to meet fellow members of the San Diego innovation community, during a networking reception in the adjacent Arango Foyer that will begin immediately after the talk.

You can find more details and registration information here; tickets are going fast, so act quickly. Xconomy San Diego editor Bruce Bigelow and I look forward to seeing you there, future presidents.

Comments (2) | Reprints | Share:          

Battery manufacturer A123 Systems of Watertown, MA, said yesterday that it has applied to the Department of Energy for $1.84 billion in federal loans under the department’s “green car” program. A123 says it wants to use the money to build a factory in southeastern Michigan that will manufacture lithium ion batteries for up to 5 million hybrid vehicles per year, or 500,000 plug-in electric vehicles per year, by 2013. Executives at Chrysler and GM, Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm, Senators Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow, and Representative John Dingell, as well as Massachusetts Senator John Kerry all voiced their support for A123′s application under the DoE’s Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Incentive Program.

Comments (2) | Reprints | Share:          

Electric Cars Making Inroads

In a sign that the era of gas guzzlers may be ending, the Wall Street Journal observes that even in Texas, people are leaving their SUVs in the garage in favor of smaller electric cars. As the paper puts it, “You Know Gas Prices Are High When Texans Start Driving Golf Carts.” The story says the tiny vehicles take some getting used to, but people seem willing to switch given how much they save on gas.

Does Street View Really Violate Your Privacy?

A Pittsburgh couple has sued Google over its Street View feature, which contained a photo of the outside of their house. Aaron and Christine Boring say the feature lowered the value of their property and caused them mental suffering. A blogger at CNET News feels the Borings might be taking the notion of privacy a little bit too far.

Researcher Suggests Ways to Cope with NIH Budget

After doubling from 1998 to 2003, the budget for research at the National Institutes of Health has leveled off, leaving some researchers scrambling for funding. Now a demographer at the Alfred P. Sloan foundation is looking for ways to make the grant process less of a roller coaster, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education. Michael Teitelbaum wants a new NIH advisory committee to, among other proposals, look at revising the number of postdoc positions available.

Magazine Looks At Morally Questionable Internet Trolls

Here’s a chance to get a jump on a piece that will surely spur some discussion. The New York Times has published on its website a story from its upcoming Sunday magazine about Internet trolls who are, in the paper’s words, “part of a growing Internet subculture with a fluid morality and a disdain for pretty much everyone else online.”

California Loans Promote Solar Power

A law enacted this week allows cities and counties in California to make loans to homeowners wishing to install solar panels on their houses or upgrade to energy-saving appliances. According to the Los Angeles Times, the law allows residents to pay back the low-interest loans over decades through their property taxes. Lawmakers hope the program will boost the installation of solar panels, which can cost $15,000 to $30,000 per house.

Is Cleantech Too Green for VCs?

Venture capitalists are hot on the trail of new cleantech startups they can fund, scouting both academia and the national laboratories for promising technologies. But GigaOm wonders if some of these deals may be too green in another sense—not yet ripe enough for market. Some of the deals may take more than a decade to reach an exit point, much longer than the five to seven years VCs are used to.

Group Lobbies for Gore’s Energy Goals

The Alliance for Climate Protection, a group founded by Al Gore, is in Washington pushing Gore’s vision of an oil-free future. As Reuters reports, the group’s CEO, Cathy Zoi, says there are no technological obstacles standing in the way of clean power. Even with existing technologies, she argues, the average family could cut its energy use by 20 percent.

Open-Source Developers Should Speak to Security, Expert Says

Developers of open-source software need to redefine the way society responds to national security threats, Christine Peterson of the Foresight Institute told the OSCON open-source convention recently. Peterson called for the open-source community to start addressing issues from problems with electronic voting to threats from cyberterrorists abroad, Ars Technica reports. Without the community’s participation, she warned, the government will take the lead in addressing security threats, and may come up with top-down solutions the community won’t like.

Daily TIPs (technology, innovation, policy) is produced in collaboration with

Comments | Reprints | Share:          

Electrics Cars Coming to America

Think, a Norwegian company that makes cars that run only on electricity, has opened a North American division and hopes to start-selling its autos in the U.S. in 2009, Business Week reports. The Think Ox is about the size of a Prius, runs for 125-155 miles per charge on rechargeable lithium ion batteries, and goes from 0 to 60 mph in 8.5 seconds. One wonders if the Ox name, presumably designed to evoke clean air, will have the same effect on sales that the Chevy Nova—”no go” in Spanish—legendarily had on sales in Latin America.

Changing MPG Standard Could Save Fuel

The way we think about fuel efficiency could be undermining our ability to actually figure out how much a car can save us in gas costs, researchers at Duke University suggest. New Scientist reports that a study found that people think doubling the miles per gallon of a compact car has the same effect on overall fuel consumption as doubling it in an SUV: that is, going from 10 to 20 mpg saves five gallons per 100 miles, while going from 25 to 50 mpg saves only two. The scientists want to flip the Environmental Protection Agency’s standard on its head, from miles per gallon to gallons per (100) miles, which they say would make the picture clearer

Big Business Wants a Climate Plan

Ninety-nine large businesses from all over the world, including ALCOA and Shell, want global leaders to get together on greenhouse-gas targets and an international carbon market, Bloomberg says. The statement, prepared by the World Economic Forum, was presented ahead of next month’s meeting of the Group of Eight industrialized nations. The U.S. has said it won’t agree to any binding targets unless China and India do also.

DARPA Not Underperforming, Director Says

Following on a report that the Department of Defense took away $32 million from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency because the agency was having a hard time allocating the funds, DARPA’s director says the Pentagon doesn’t understand how the agency works. According to Wired, director Tony Tether says there was unspent money because of his heightened supervision of projects. Some finished early, before all the money was spent, and some were cancelled because of poor performance, he says.

Court Debates the Meaning of “Infringement”

A federal judge may grant a mistrial in a file-sharing case after conceding he may have given the jury the wrong information about whether an action was a copyright infringement, Ars Technica reports. The judge had told the jury that merely making a copyrighted song available on a peer-to-peer network counted as infringement. But a friend-of-the-court brief from nine professors of copyright law argue that “making available” isn’t the same as “distributing” someone else’s property. The case could help define the line between stealing and fair use.

Heart Imaging Drugs Can Cause Death, FDA Warns

The continued use of certain drugs, known as contrast agents, to improve ultrasound images of the heart is leading to deaths, the Food and Drug Administration says. An AP story on Forbes.com reports that the FDA put out a warning in October, but since then has received four reports of patients dying after being injected with Definity, a drug formerly marketed by Bristol Myers Squibb. Researchers have been developing agents that are easier to see on ultrasound or MRI scans as a way to spot hard-to-find defects.

Daily TIPs (technology, innovation, policy) is produced in collaboration with

Comments | Reprints | Share:          

When General Motors unveiled its lavish 330-acre, Eero Saarinen-designed technical center in 1956, company president Harlow Curtice cruised to the podium in a shark-finned, bubble-domed Firebird II gas turbine experimental car. “We must put more emphasis on basic research, pure research,” Curtice declared, later adding, “I hope you will come to regard the General Motors technical center in the same way I do—as one of the nation’s great resources—more important even than the natural resources with which we have been endowed.”

More than a half-century later, no one gushes about “pure” research at GM or virtually any other industry lab—competition is too fierce, the pressure to conduct R&D directly relevant to the core business too intense. But that doesn’t mean the nation’s biggest carmaker doesn’t nurture big dreams about the future of vehicles, which run from hydrogen-powered cars to environmentally friendly vehicles that never crash. And it turns out that those dreams have some strong New England connections. So when president of GM North America Troy Clarke came to town yesterday, I asked him about the company’s vision for the future, and how two deals with local roots—its big investments in Watertown, MA’s A123Systems and in Coskata, an Illinois biofuels company backed by Waltham, MA-based Advanced Technology Ventures—fit in. That’s when he started waxing on about new types of batteries and cars that run on your trash.

“In some regards in the auto industry, and I don’t mean to be melodramatic, we’re at the beginning of time again,” Clarke told me. “There’s more technology opportunities than I think there have been since the industry started a hundred years ago.”

He was speaking primarily about the forces at work around climate change, the cost of petroleum-based fuels, and energy security. And he posed the problem, “How much can we afford to invest in infrastructure for personal transportation, and what are the costs of that?”

An unexpectedly introspective question, perhaps, from the man in charge of GM’s North American operations. But it’s probably good news that despite the pressures of the day, GM is spending some time looking ahead 50 years or more. And the automaker has plenty of projects on all these fronts, work I couldn’t sum up in a short article. But its hydrogen-powered fuel cell activity, to take just one example, is evidenced in Project Driveway, an effort announced last fall to put a test fleet of 100 cars with hydrogen fuel cells on the roads (85 of these have already been deployed, Clarke says). And Clarke spoke pretty passionately about the company’s farther-out visions, which include lightweight and fuel-efficient cars that are also safe (you can make lightweight cars now out of exotic and costly materials, Clarke says, but not only are they expensive, they don’t pass crash tests).

The solution, says Clarke: “I just have to make sure the vehicle doesn’t crash.” He sketched out a future of networked roadways and cars that talk to each other, with vehicle override systems taking control when needed. For those who might not like the idea of a car taking control of its owner, he points out that vehicles like the Chevrolet Corvette already have override systems that help owners drive much better in tough conditions. “Could you [make] a vehicle that couldn’t run into something? Yeah, I think you could,” Clarke says.

To that end, GM has been sponsoring work at places like Carnegie Mellon University, where it teamed up with the school’s engineers and computer scientists to enter an autonomous vehicle in DARPA’s Urban Challenge last fall.

But a road system without crashes is probably many decades away—and I wanted to know about some local investments poised to lead to commercial products much sooner. The first was GM’s contract with A123Systems, … Next Page »

Comments (1) | Reprints | Share:          

Local battery powerhouse A123Systems is delving further into the automotive market, thanks to a three-way deal involving itself, Norwegian electric car company Think, and General Electric. A123 has signed a deal to put its lithium-ion rechargeable batteries into Think’s vehicles.

Think is making an electric car, the City, that has a top speed of 60 mph and can go about 120 miles between recharges. It’s already on sale in Norway, and should be available internationally later this year. The company is also developing the Ox, a five-seater it says is close in size to an SUV, but lighter and more aerodynamic. That’s due out in 2009. (I didn’t speak to anyone at Think, but I’m guessing the name “Ox” is supposed to suggest oxygen, rather than a lumbering beast of burden. Maybe they’ll rename it if they move into the American market.)

Both vehicles are designed to rely on either a sodium or a lithium battery. In addition to A123, which makes the “Nanophosphate” lithium-ion battery, Think is working with Enerdel of Indianpolis, which makes a lithium-manganese system.

A123 batteries contain nanomaterials that let them hold more energy, run longer, and recharge faster than traditional lithium-ion systems. To build batteries for electric cars, the company has to take its individual battery cells and design them to operate in connected stacks that work with the car’s electrical system. The two vehicles, which will have different operating ranges, will require two different battery-pack designs, says David Vieau, CEO of A123. That’s why A123 is teaming up with battery-pack design experts at GE’s Global Research Center. The collaboration will “accelerate the timeline,” according to Vieu.

Meanwhile, another branch of General Electric, GE Energy Financial Services, is putting money into both companies to help advance the development of the electric cars. GE invested $4 million in Think, and increased its investment in A123Systems to more than $20 million. Vieau wouldn’t say exactly how much GE put in as part of this latest deal, but overall it’s the largest cash investor in A123, which has raised $148 million in financing to date.

He said both GE and A123 had been in talks with Think about battery systems, and the multi-party deal just made sense. “All of it kind of came together at the same time,” he says.

A123 has also been working with General Motors to provide the battery for GM’s electric vehicle, the Volt, and with BAE Systems to help power hybrid buses. Vieau says the deal with Think is yet another step into the transportation market.

But that doesn’t mean it will be solely a car parts company. A123 is also continuing its relationship with Black & Decker—among its first commercial products were batteries for high-power, longer lasting power tools. Still, Vieau says, “The transportation market is going to be our largest overall.”

Comments (8) | Reprints | Share: