<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Five Tech Advances of the 2000s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/12/21/top-five-tech-advances-of-the-past-decade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/12/21/top-five-tech-advances-of-the-past-decade/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Frankston</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/12/21/top-five-tech-advances-of-the-past-decade/comment-page-1/#comment-101327</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Frankston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=55912#comment-101327</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the appeal of &quot;Ubiquitous wireless Internet access&quot; but the technology is limited by the current funding model called &quot;telecommunication&quot;. We won&#039;t get ubiquity till we fund connectivity as infrastructure rather than from the Internet as a billable service (Broadband)

http://rmf.vc/?n=IAC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the appeal of “Ubiquitous wireless Internet access” but the technology is limited by the current funding model called “telecommunication”. We won’t get ubiquity till we fund connectivity as infrastructure rather than from the Internet as a billable service (Broadband)</p>
<p><a href="http://rmf.vc/?n=IAC" rel="nofollow">http://rmf.vc/?n=IAC</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

