<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Don’t Touch My Bags If You Please, Mr. Customs Man”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/10/05/%e2%80%9cdon%e2%80%99t-touch-my-bags-if-you-please-mr-customs-man%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/10/05/%e2%80%9cdon%e2%80%99t-touch-my-bags-if-you-please-mr-customs-man%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Lyman</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/10/05/%e2%80%9cdon%e2%80%99t-touch-my-bags-if-you-please-mr-customs-man%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-86148</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Lyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=44380#comment-86148</guid>
		<description>Steve, I delayed answering your question to give others a chance to chime in. The trends are clear that the production of biologics overseas is growing rapidly. There are a number of companies in countries such as India and China that are already manufacturing generic biologic versions (biosimilars) of epo, G-CSF, GM-CSF, insulin, growth hormone, and others for their own markets. At present there are strong barriers that keep these molecules from being exported to some countries, such as the US, although they are being exported to other countries around the world. There are a number of political, organizational, intellectual property, and manufacturing issues that will need to be resolved before we see large scale production of biologics made overseas with the intent of selling them in the US. One of the primary factors will be that the US FDA will need to establish inspectors in these countries to sign off on the quality of the drugs made there. There will need to be a significant effort to scale up manufacturing expertise and approved supply chains in these countries, and to get local government approval as well. We will see Big Pharma respond to the financial threat of biosimilars by making their own generics to compete against their branded biologics. This is already happening with small molecules. In addition, there will be an increased emphasis on second generation biologics to extend patent protection i.e. drug franchises, as Amgen has done with Neupogen/Neulasta and Epogen/Aranesp.  I will also predict that this outsourcing trend will not be without serious challenges, as Boeing has seen with their outsourcing program of the 787 Dreamliner. Producing products locally with a skilled, highly trained and experienced workforce will always have certain advantages over outsourcing to a foreign country, especially when problems arise and when you are trying to make a product for the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I delayed answering your question to give others a chance to chime in. The trends are clear that the production of biologics overseas is growing rapidly. There are a number of companies in countries such as India and China that are already manufacturing generic biologic versions (biosimilars) of epo, G-CSF, GM-CSF, insulin, growth hormone, and others for their own markets. At present there are strong barriers that keep these molecules from being exported to some countries, such as the US, although they are being exported to other countries around the world. There are a number of political, organizational, intellectual property, and manufacturing issues that will need to be resolved before we see large scale production of biologics made overseas with the intent of selling them in the US. One of the primary factors will be that the US FDA will need to establish inspectors in these countries to sign off on the quality of the drugs made there. There will need to be a significant effort to scale up manufacturing expertise and approved supply chains in these countries, and to get local government approval as well. We will see Big Pharma respond to the financial threat of biosimilars by making their own generics to compete against their branded biologics. This is already happening with small molecules. In addition, there will be an increased emphasis on second generation biologics to extend patent protection i.e. drug franchises, as Amgen has done with Neupogen/Neulasta and Epogen/Aranesp.  I will also predict that this outsourcing trend will not be without serious challenges, as Boeing has seen with their outsourcing program of the 787 Dreamliner. Producing products locally with a skilled, highly trained and experienced workforce will always have certain advantages over outsourcing to a foreign country, especially when problems arise and when you are trying to make a product for the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve s</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/10/05/%e2%80%9cdon%e2%80%99t-touch-my-bags-if-you-please-mr-customs-man%e2%80%9d/comment-page-1/#comment-85517</link>
		<dc:creator>steve s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=44380#comment-85517</guid>
		<description>I would like to hear Dr Lyman&#039;s opinion on the future of outsourced development and manufacturing of biologics to China, Singapore, Korea and India.  Big pharma is already building manufacturing and R&amp;D in China and several Biotech companies are planning the same.  Nektar has a major R&amp;D site in India.  Medicinal chemistry work at CMO, CRO and company owned facilities are largely accomplished overseas.  Today, most if not all small molecule generic drugs are manufactured in China and legally imported to the US for testing, formulation, and distribution.  That&#039;s why Walmart can offer generic small molecule drugs for $4 per month.  What happens 10 years from now to US based R&amp;D and manufacturing of biologics when China and India have mature regulatory systems, huge biologic CMO capacity, and Big Biotech owned manufacturing sites?  Can Amgen afford to not manufacture in China?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to hear Dr Lyman’s opinion on the future of outsourced development and manufacturing of biologics to China, Singapore, Korea and India.  Big pharma is already building manufacturing and R&amp;D in China and several Biotech companies are planning the same.  Nektar has a major R&amp;D site in India.  Medicinal chemistry work at CMO, CRO and company owned facilities are largely accomplished overseas.  Today, most if not all small molecule generic drugs are manufactured in China and legally imported to the US for testing, formulation, and distribution.  That’s why Walmart can offer generic small molecule drugs for $4 per month.  What happens 10 years from now to US based R&amp;D and manufacturing of biologics when China and India have mature regulatory systems, huge biologic CMO capacity, and Big Biotech owned manufacturing sites?  Can Amgen afford to not manufacture in China?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

