<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gerry Langeler of OVP on Digital Energy and the Cyclical Nature of Venture Capital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/05/12/gerry-langeler-of-ovp-on-digital-energy-and-the-cyclical-nature-of-venture-capital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/05/12/gerry-langeler-of-ovp-on-digital-energy-and-the-cyclical-nature-of-venture-capital/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:07:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/05/12/gerry-langeler-of-ovp-on-digital-energy-and-the-cyclical-nature-of-venture-capital/comment-page-1/#comment-57628</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=24537#comment-57628</guid>
		<description>OVP’s cleantech investment strategy actually sounds sensible, unlike most, and I hope it works. Traditional VC’s are ill-suited to funding infrastructure type investment projects. The returns are generally lower than VC’s IRR targets, although only a few VC’s have made decent returns in the past decade. More importantly, VC’s simply do not have the $$’s. They are not buyout or infrastructure funds. VC’s funds are generally measured in hundreds of millions of dollars, not in multiple billions. Most VC&#039;s also have very, very little experience investing in highly capital intensive businesses.  VC’s invest in technology not in power plants…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OVP’s cleantech investment strategy actually sounds sensible, unlike most, and I hope it works. Traditional VC’s are ill-suited to funding infrastructure type investment projects. The returns are generally lower than VC’s IRR targets, although only a few VC’s have made decent returns in the past decade. More importantly, VC’s simply do not have the $$’s. They are not buyout or infrastructure funds. VC’s funds are generally measured in hundreds of millions of dollars, not in multiple billions. Most VC’s also have very, very little experience investing in highly capital intensive businesses.  VC’s invest in technology not in power plants…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

