<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Aims to Help Scientists Move Past Excel, Make Sense of Gene Data Overload</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/04/28/microsoft-aims-to-help-scientists-move-past-excel-make-sense-of-gene-data-overload/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/04/28/microsoft-aims-to-help-scientists-move-past-excel-make-sense-of-gene-data-overload/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ss</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/04/28/microsoft-aims-to-help-scientists-move-past-excel-make-sense-of-gene-data-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-62686</link>
		<dc:creator>ss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=22001#comment-62686</guid>
		<description>statistical environment &lt;a href=&quot;http://r-project.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;R&lt;/a&gt; and scripting language &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bioperl.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;perl&lt;/a&gt; do an infinitely better job than excel. anybody serious about informatics in biology uses these or similar tools, not excel. pre-packaged solutions are tricky in biology because of high variance in assay platforms between and even within vendors&#039; offerings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>statistical environment <a href="http://r-project.org" rel="nofollow">R</a> and scripting language <a href="http://www.bioperl.org" rel="nofollow">perl</a> do an infinitely better job than excel. anybody serious about informatics in biology uses these or similar tools, not excel. pre-packaged solutions are tricky in biology because of high variance in assay platforms between and even within vendors’ offerings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshuadf</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/04/28/microsoft-aims-to-help-scientists-move-past-excel-make-sense-of-gene-data-overload/comment-page-1/#comment-55191</link>
		<dc:creator>joshuadf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=22001#comment-55191</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bhi.washington.edu/News-and-Events/Announcements/UW-TO-USE-MICROSOFT-AMALGA-TO-SUPPORT-CLINICAL-AND-TRANSLATIONAL-RESEARCH.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UW is also piloting Amalga (formerly Azyxxi)&lt;/a&gt;. I know nothing beyond public information, but the little I&#039;ve seen does not seem to be anywhere near as easy to use as Excel. On the other hand, the researchers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iths.org/bmi&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I talk to&lt;/a&gt; definitely see the need to move beyond Excel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.bhi.washington.edu/News-and-Events/Announcements/UW-TO-USE-MICROSOFT-AMALGA-TO-SUPPORT-CLINICAL-AND-TRANSLATIONAL-RESEARCH.html" rel="nofollow">UW is also piloting Amalga (formerly Azyxxi)</a>. I know nothing beyond public information, but the little I’ve seen does not seem to be anywhere near as easy to use as Excel. On the other hand, the researchers <a href="http://www.iths.org/bmi" rel="nofollow">I talk to</a> definitely see the need to move beyond Excel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

