<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Seattle VCs Are Adapting to the UW TechTransfer Revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/04/15/how-seattle-vcs-are-adapting-to-the-uw-techtransfer-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/04/15/how-seattle-vcs-are-adapting-to-the-uw-techtransfer-revolution/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catch Up - The Quantum Pontiff</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/04/15/how-seattle-vcs-are-adapting-to-the-uw-techtransfer-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-170783</link>
		<dc:creator>Catch Up - The Quantum Pontiff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=20399#comment-170783</guid>
		<description>[...] tuition increase, 30 percent budget decrease. Why does the house hate education so? UW TechTransfer kickin&#8217; butt and taking names, but the Life Science Discovery Fund is on the brink of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tuition increase, 30 percent budget decrease. Why does the house hate education so? UW TechTransfer kickin’ butt and taking names, but the Life Science Discovery Fund is on the brink of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Lazowska</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/04/15/how-seattle-vcs-are-adapting-to-the-uw-techtransfer-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-53762</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Lazowska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=20399#comment-53762</guid>
		<description>As someone who was instrumental in brokering the marriage between Linden Rhoads and the University of Washington, I&#039;m particularly thrilled at the changes she&#039;s making, and at the positive reaction to them.

However, at the risk of sounding a bit defensive:

- Yes, UW can and should do better at tech transfer.

- However, it&#039;s important to remember that UW consistently ranks among the top dozen universities in the nation in a number of key measures related to tech transfer.

- It&#039;s also worth knowing that under Linden&#039;s predecessor&#039;s predecessor (got that?), Bob Miller, UW developed what was widely regarded as the most innovative and effective software tech transfer practice in the nation.

- It&#039;s important to remember that the vast majority of university entrepreneurship takes place not through &quot;traditional&quot; tech transfer - licensing - but rather through alumni, who throughout their careers create new companies and transform existing ones.

- Finally, the reason that Madrona gets so many UW deals is that THEY WORK THEIR TAILS OFF.  They&#039;re here all the time - walking the halls, talking to faculty, talking to students, visiting labs, offering advice, awarding prizes, helping with courses, mining the research for commercializable ideas.  That&#039;s the same way that Kleiner established its relationship with Stanford in the 1980&#039;s - John Doerr walked the halls.  I&#039;ve noticed, over the years, that the less engaged specific VC&#039;s are, the more they tend to complain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who was instrumental in brokering the marriage between Linden Rhoads and the University of Washington, I’m particularly thrilled at the changes she’s making, and at the positive reaction to them.</p>
<p>However, at the risk of sounding a bit defensive:</p>
<p>- Yes, UW can and should do better at tech transfer.</p>
<p>- However, it’s important to remember that UW consistently ranks among the top dozen universities in the nation in a number of key measures related to tech transfer.</p>
<p>- It’s also worth knowing that under Linden’s predecessor’s predecessor (got that?), Bob Miller, UW developed what was widely regarded as the most innovative and effective software tech transfer practice in the nation.</p>
<p>- It’s important to remember that the vast majority of university entrepreneurship takes place not through “traditional” tech transfer – licensing – but rather through alumni, who throughout their careers create new companies and transform existing ones.</p>
<p>- Finally, the reason that Madrona gets so many UW deals is that THEY WORK THEIR TAILS OFF.  They’re here all the time – walking the halls, talking to faculty, talking to students, visiting labs, offering advice, awarding prizes, helping with courses, mining the research for commercializable ideas.  That’s the same way that Kleiner established its relationship with Stanford in the 1980′s – John Doerr walked the halls.  I’ve noticed, over the years, that the less engaged specific VC’s are, the more they tend to complain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

