<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seattle Layoff Update: Exide, Expedia, Impinj, Sun Trim Staff; MSN Encarta, Trusera to Close</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/04/03/seattle-layoff-update-exide-expedia-impinj-sun-trim-staff-msn-encarta-trusera-to-close/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/04/03/seattle-layoff-update-exide-expedia-impinj-sun-trim-staff-msn-encarta-trusera-to-close/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:52:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/04/03/seattle-layoff-update-exide-expedia-impinj-sun-trim-staff-msn-encarta-trusera-to-close/comment-page-1/#comment-53207</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=18962#comment-53207</guid>
		<description>(Apologies if it seems like I&#039;m really labouring this point) You could argue that November and now are different redundancy initiatives but most of these redundancies have come about as a result of a massive reorganisation within Expedia as opposed to just culling 5-6% of its workforce for fiscal reasons.  It just so happens that it was less difficult to make those cuts in the IT organisation of Expedia in November than it was elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Apologies if it seems like I&#8217;m really labouring this point) You could argue that November and now are different redundancy initiatives but most of these redundancies have come about as a result of a massive reorganisation within Expedia as opposed to just culling 5-6% of its workforce for fiscal reasons.  It just so happens that it was less difficult to make those cuts in the IT organisation of Expedia in November than it was elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/04/03/seattle-layoff-update-exide-expedia-impinj-sun-trim-staff-msn-encarta-trusera-to-close/comment-page-1/#comment-53205</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=18962#comment-53205</guid>
		<description>I myself have just been made redundant from Expdia and my perception is that redundancies have been implemented as a continuum from November through to now.  

You also have to consider that the consultation process to manage the redundancies can take anywhere between 4-10 weeks in Europe (the French in particular have a convoluted system for this process which involves trade unions and bureaucracy and predictably takes three times longer than anywhere else).  So I was put on notice of redundancy at the same time as people in Bellevue about six weeks ago but the discrepancies in the labour laws (from Europe to North America) will partly explain why it appears that Expedia is undertaking multiple rounds of redundancy.

You could potentially argue that the redundancies in November and now are different although I believe that both have come about as result of Expedia significantly reorganising itself rather than a desire to excise 5-6% of its workforce.  It just so happens it was easier to get rid of the IT resources in November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I myself have just been made redundant from Expdia and my perception is that redundancies have been implemented as a continuum from November through to now.  </p>
<p>You also have to consider that the consultation process to manage the redundancies can take anywhere between 4-10 weeks in Europe (the French in particular have a convoluted system for this process which involves trade unions and bureaucracy and predictably takes three times longer than anywhere else).  So I was put on notice of redundancy at the same time as people in Bellevue about six weeks ago but the discrepancies in the labour laws (from Europe to North America) will partly explain why it appears that Expedia is undertaking multiple rounds of redundancy.</p>
<p>You could potentially argue that the redundancies in November and now are different although I believe that both have come about as result of Expedia significantly reorganising itself rather than a desire to excise 5-6% of its workforce.  It just so happens it was easier to get rid of the IT resources in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/04/03/seattle-layoff-update-exide-expedia-impinj-sun-trim-staff-msn-encarta-trusera-to-close/comment-page-1/#comment-52769</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=18962#comment-52769</guid>
		<description>About 160 were laid off in the first round at EXPEDIA. SOurce: http://expedianews.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=466</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 160 were laid off in the first round at EXPEDIA. SOurce: <a href="http://expedianews.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=466" rel="nofollow">http://expedianews.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=466</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
