<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey, Don&#8217;t Forget the Puget Sound Life Sciences Universe!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/02/09/hey-dont-forget-the-puget-sound-life-sciences-universe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/02/09/hey-dont-forget-the-puget-sound-life-sciences-universe/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:52:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sanjaya Joshi</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2009/02/09/hey-dont-forget-the-puget-sound-life-sciences-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-45717</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjaya Joshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=11904#comment-45717</guid>
		<description>Thank you for mentioning this, Luke. I had started this work in 2004 (published in 2005) entirely in my copious spare time, as compared to the &quot;sponsored&quot; work by Dr. Mayer. Eye-popping graphics on the Tech Universe!

I have tasted the local entrepreneurial water for a while now, and remain passionate about the local economy and tax base provided by the life-sciences industry...

I fully agree with Stewart Lyman&#039;s Xconomist Forum posting today about the state government involvement which has been sorely lacking for small business -- almost all the state money in the past (owing to the State Constitution) has gone to educational and non-profit entities. John Castle (at UW Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship) had commented  a while back that educational institutions and non-profits were a &quot;zero-sum-game&quot;. The region will grow as a tax base only when the state government realizes that it is the &#039;bottom-up&#039; small business scaffolding that builds the tax base.

With regards to boxiness of the chart, I remember the quote from the movie Cadillac Man: &quot;boxy, but good&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for mentioning this, Luke. I had started this work in 2004 (published in 2005) entirely in my copious spare time, as compared to the &#8220;sponsored&#8221; work by Dr. Mayer. Eye-popping graphics on the Tech Universe!</p>
<p>I have tasted the local entrepreneurial water for a while now, and remain passionate about the local economy and tax base provided by the life-sciences industry&#8230;</p>
<p>I fully agree with Stewart Lyman&#8217;s Xconomist Forum posting today about the state government involvement which has been sorely lacking for small business &#8212; almost all the state money in the past (owing to the State Constitution) has gone to educational and non-profit entities. John Castle (at UW Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship) had commented  a while back that educational institutions and non-profits were a &#8220;zero-sum-game&#8221;. The region will grow as a tax base only when the state government realizes that it is the &#8216;bottom-up&#8217; small business scaffolding that builds the tax base.</p>
<p>With regards to boxiness of the chart, I remember the quote from the movie Cadillac Man: &#8220;boxy, but good&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
