<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Luck, Curiosity, Naivete: The Essential Ingredients of Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/12/16/how-to-light-an-inspirational-fire-seattle-ceos-discuss-at-fireside-chat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/12/16/how-to-light-an-inspirational-fire-seattle-ceos-discuss-at-fireside-chat/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:30:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: srini n</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/12/16/how-to-light-an-inspirational-fire-seattle-ceos-discuss-at-fireside-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-43706</link>
		<dc:creator>srini n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 09:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=6966#comment-43706</guid>
		<description>Inspiring article indeed. 

It is understandable that the CEOs favor small units for being the fountainhead of innovation. Yet, like IBM and 3M do, institutional support (read: funding) for breaking new frontiers in technology and product invention is a sine qua non.

The idea of hedging by getting VCs with diverse focus is not really new but nonetheless worth repetition.

The challenge lies in improving the &#039;hit rate&#039; of innovation and the shrinking of the idea-to-application lead time. A combination of these two can reduce the over all costs and make new products/technologies affordable thus setting up a virtuous cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inspiring article indeed. </p>
<p>It is understandable that the CEOs favor small units for being the fountainhead of innovation. Yet, like IBM and 3M do, institutional support (read: funding) for breaking new frontiers in technology and product invention is a sine qua non.</p>
<p>The idea of hedging by getting VCs with diverse focus is not really new but nonetheless worth repetition.</p>
<p>The challenge lies in improving the &#8216;hit rate&#8217; of innovation and the shrinking of the idea-to-application lead time. A combination of these two can reduce the over all costs and make new products/technologies affordable thus setting up a virtuous cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
