<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redfin Layoffs Bode Ill for Real Estate Startups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/10/14/redfin-layoffs-bode-ill-for-real-estate-startups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/10/14/redfin-layoffs-bode-ill-for-real-estate-startups/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:27:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan W</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/10/14/redfin-layoffs-bode-ill-for-real-estate-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-44293</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=5570#comment-44293</guid>
		<description>Red Fin and Findwell just give 50%. 500 Realty gives 75% back to the consumer with a far less minimum.  WAKE UP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red Fin and Findwell just give 50%. 500 Realty gives 75% back to the consumer with a far less minimum.  WAKE UP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/10/14/redfin-layoffs-bode-ill-for-real-estate-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-40121</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 06:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=5570#comment-40121</guid>
		<description>A listing prospect was about to hire redfin to sell her home, but after looking at my team&#039;s marketing plan, sales in the neighborhood, and list to sales price ratios, realized we were the better choice and hired us. Due to our in depth knowledge of the neighborhood, ability to network with other agents (redfin lacks this crucial advantage), and sales skills, we sold the home in only a few weeks and earned the seller a much higher sales price than expected! A discounted commission may sound enticing up front, but the real proof are the net proceeds the seller pockets when escrow closes. Local, skilled, full-service Realtors will always be the #1 choice for both sellers and buyers! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A listing prospect was about to hire redfin to sell her home, but after looking at my team&#8217;s marketing plan, sales in the neighborhood, and list to sales price ratios, realized we were the better choice and hired us. Due to our in depth knowledge of the neighborhood, ability to network with other agents (redfin lacks this crucial advantage), and sales skills, we sold the home in only a few weeks and earned the seller a much higher sales price than expected! A discounted commission may sound enticing up front, but the real proof are the net proceeds the seller pockets when escrow closes. Local, skilled, full-service Realtors will always be the #1 choice for both sellers and buyers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealStats</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/10/14/redfin-layoffs-bode-ill-for-real-estate-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-36478</link>
		<dc:creator>RealStats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=5570#comment-36478</guid>
		<description>The market speaks...

Real statistics, NOT Redfin&#039;s cook the books numbers. &lt;b&gt;Odds less than 10% of getting a home sold at market.&lt;/b&gt;

2 years in SF, the real 7x7 San Francisco, not the entire Bay Area show:

10 Condo Sellers experienced in 2 years:
5 Expired or Withdrawn
4 Sold Below Asking 
1 Actually sold for more $500 more to be exact.
(After 2/3 rebate returned - Sales netted Redfin a little more than $26k over 2 years.)

7 Home Sellers experienced in 2 years:
3 Expired or Withdrawn
2 Sold Below Asking
2 Sold Above Asking (3% and 5%)
(After 2/3 rebate returned - Sales netted Redfin less than $25k over 2 years.)

* All Refin sales as reported by the SF MLS 1/2006 - 10/2008.

&lt;b&gt;50% failure rate is what real statistics say.
&lt;i&gt;No &#039;cook the books&#039; numbers here.&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;  

If I were a venture capitalist with money in Redfin, I&#039;d be a little jittery right now wondering if I&#039;ll see any return on my VC $$$. &lt;b&gt;$51,000 earned in SF pre-tax $$ over 2 years.&lt;/b&gt;

The market speaks...

BTW - Watched a buyer over pay by $40k, to get a 2/3 commission rebate. Now that&#039;s determination!

Seen other internet companies fail in 2001?  Will more fail in 2008???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The market speaks&#8230;</p>
<p>Real statistics, NOT Redfin&#8217;s cook the books numbers. <b>Odds less than 10% of getting a home sold at market.</b></p>
<p>2 years in SF, the real 7&#215;7 San Francisco, not the entire Bay Area show:</p>
<p>10 Condo Sellers experienced in 2 years:<br />
5 Expired or Withdrawn<br />
4 Sold Below Asking<br />
1 Actually sold for more $500 more to be exact.<br />
(After 2/3 rebate returned &#8211; Sales netted Redfin a little more than $26k over 2 years.)</p>
<p>7 Home Sellers experienced in 2 years:<br />
3 Expired or Withdrawn<br />
2 Sold Below Asking<br />
2 Sold Above Asking (3% and 5%)<br />
(After 2/3 rebate returned &#8211; Sales netted Redfin less than $25k over 2 years.)</p>
<p>* All Refin sales as reported by the SF MLS 1/2006 &#8211; 10/2008.</p>
<p><b>50% failure rate is what real statistics say.<br />
<i>No &#8216;cook the books&#8217; numbers here.&gt;</i></b>  </p>
<p>If I were a venture capitalist with money in Redfin, I&#8217;d be a little jittery right now wondering if I&#8217;ll see any return on my VC $$$. <b>$51,000 earned in SF pre-tax $$ over 2 years.</b></p>
<p>The market speaks&#8230;</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; Watched a buyer over pay by $40k, to get a 2/3 commission rebate. Now that&#8217;s determination!</p>
<p>Seen other internet companies fail in 2001?  Will more fail in 2008???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amarjit</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/10/14/redfin-layoffs-bode-ill-for-real-estate-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-32342</link>
		<dc:creator>Amarjit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=5570#comment-32342</guid>
		<description>Look at 500Realty. It has better model than redfin. It has postive cash flow as it does not hire any agents and gives back 75% as compared to Redfin&#039;s 66%.

www.500realty.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at 500Realty. It has better model than redfin. It has postive cash flow as it does not hire any agents and gives back 75% as compared to Redfin&#8217;s 66%.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.500realty.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.500realty.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Longo</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/10/14/redfin-layoffs-bode-ill-for-real-estate-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-32240</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Longo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=5570#comment-32240</guid>
		<description>I think Glenn is ahead of the curve on this one (or I hope he is at least).  We both launched our Boston markets at almost the same time.  Very similar business models, but very different corporate structures.  Kelman is operating a first class operation with much needed great customer service in this industry.   I don&#039;t see these guys slowing down one bit...just a little re-org...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Glenn is ahead of the curve on this one (or I hope he is at least).  We both launched our Boston markets at almost the same time.  Very similar business models, but very different corporate structures.  Kelman is operating a first class operation with much needed great customer service in this industry.   I don&#8217;t see these guys slowing down one bit&#8230;just a little re-org&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Knudsen</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/10/14/redfin-layoffs-bode-ill-for-real-estate-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-32214</link>
		<dc:creator>David Knudsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=5570#comment-32214</guid>
		<description>A layoff isn&#039;t a shutdown, and a 20% staff cut actually a little light relative to the transaction slowdowns being seen around the country. I think traditional Realtors are very short sighted to see this as the beginning of the end for Redfin, and somehow marks the triumph of the traditional full service brokerage. Both Redfin and traditional bricks and mortar brokerages have pretty high overhead — Redfin in new techologies, regular brokerages in traditional methods. I think this downturn will strip the fat off the cats, and force the real estate brokerage industry to be much more efficient and cost effective. The alternate (listing) brokerage models have suffered because, overall, they haven&#039;t been that effective at producing, and in a down market, may even be less effective. However, somebody, somewhere, is going to get it right without all the bricks and mortar overhead — and be able to produce AND reduce costs.
How we market and show houses is going to change. Licensing laws in many states will also have to change to permit, say, the showing of homes by assistants and not necessarily by licensed real estate agents and brokers. Licensing has much more to do with fiduciary responsibility than opening the door to a vacant house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A layoff isn&#8217;t a shutdown, and a 20% staff cut actually a little light relative to the transaction slowdowns being seen around the country. I think traditional Realtors are very short sighted to see this as the beginning of the end for Redfin, and somehow marks the triumph of the traditional full service brokerage. Both Redfin and traditional bricks and mortar brokerages have pretty high overhead — Redfin in new techologies, regular brokerages in traditional methods. I think this downturn will strip the fat off the cats, and force the real estate brokerage industry to be much more efficient and cost effective. The alternate (listing) brokerage models have suffered because, overall, they haven&#8217;t been that effective at producing, and in a down market, may even be less effective. However, somebody, somewhere, is going to get it right without all the bricks and mortar overhead — and be able to produce AND reduce costs.<br />
How we market and show houses is going to change. Licensing laws in many states will also have to change to permit, say, the showing of homes by assistants and not necessarily by licensed real estate agents and brokers. Licensing has much more to do with fiduciary responsibility than opening the door to a vacant house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Massengale</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/10/14/redfin-layoffs-bode-ill-for-real-estate-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-32159</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Massengale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=5570#comment-32159</guid>
		<description>I imagine Redfin will survive but I doubt they&#039;ll eclipse realtor.com.  They&#039;re still a member of an association and that&#039;s where their data comes from. Their model isn&#039;t bulletproof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine Redfin will survive but I doubt they&#8217;ll eclipse realtor.com.  They&#8217;re still a member of an association and that&#8217;s where their data comes from. Their model isn&#8217;t bulletproof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/seattle/2008/10/14/redfin-layoffs-bode-ill-for-real-estate-startups/comment-page-1/#comment-32126</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=5570#comment-32126</guid>
		<description>I still see thousands of jobs posted on employment sites.

www.linkedin.com (networking)
www.indeed.com (aggregated listings)
www.realmatch.com (matches you to jobs)

good luck to those searching for jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still see thousands of jobs posted on employment sites.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkedin.com</a> (networking)<br />
<a href="http://www.indeed.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.indeed.com</a> (aggregated listings)<br />
<a href="http://www.realmatch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.realmatch.com</a> (matches you to jobs)</p>
<p>good luck to those searching for jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
