<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VCs to Entrepreneurs: Outlook for Software Startups Is As Good—or Bad—As Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/san-diego/2009/01/14/vcs-to-entrepreneurs-outlook-for-software-startups-is-as-good-or-bad-as-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/san-diego/2009/01/14/vcs-to-entrepreneurs-outlook-for-software-startups-is-as-good-or-bad-as-ever/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: StyleHop Blog &#124; Message to Startups: Risk hasn&#8217;t increased&#8230;.it&#8217;s just changed</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/san-diego/2009/01/14/vcs-to-entrepreneurs-outlook-for-software-startups-is-as-good-or-bad-as-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-44496</link>
		<dc:creator>StyleHop Blog &#124; Message to Startups: Risk hasn&#8217;t increased&#8230;.it&#8217;s just changed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=8736#comment-44496</guid>
		<description>[...] VCs to Entrepreneurs: Outlook for Software Startups Is As Good—or Bad—As Ever [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VCs to Entrepreneurs: Outlook for Software Startups Is As Good—or Bad—As Ever [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Geshwiler</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/san-diego/2009/01/14/vcs-to-entrepreneurs-outlook-for-software-startups-is-as-good-or-bad-as-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-44461</link>
		<dc:creator>James Geshwiler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=8736#comment-44461</guid>
		<description>I really wish we&#039;d get over all this hand wringing. Yes, financial risk is up, but that is not the only risk--and not even the most important one for startups. Competitive risk is way, way down. People risk is much improved. Market risk depends on what you are selling (I wouldn&#039;t want to be pushing luxury cars now, but in high tech, we often are selling productivity and cost-cutting tools...seems like those would be in vogue more now).  A lot of startups don&#039;t need as much capital as in years past. See my presentation to Boston Web Innovators for more color, particularly on matching startup strategy to investors&#039;. http://www.slideshare.net/dbeisel/angel-venture-capital-finance-where-is-the-money-moving-presentation?type=powerpoint</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish we’d get over all this hand wringing. Yes, financial risk is up, but that is not the only risk–and not even the most important one for startups. Competitive risk is way, way down. People risk is much improved. Market risk depends on what you are selling (I wouldn’t want to be pushing luxury cars now, but in high tech, we often are selling productivity and cost-cutting tools…seems like those would be in vogue more now).  A lot of startups don’t need as much capital as in years past. See my presentation to Boston Web Innovators for more color, particularly on matching startup strategy to investors’. <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/dbeisel/angel-venture-capital-finance-where-is-the-money-moving-presentation?type=powerpoint" rel="nofollow">http://www.slideshare.net/dbeisel/angel-venture-capital-finance-where-is-the-money-moving-presentation?type=powerpoint</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Perez</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/san-diego/2009/01/14/vcs-to-entrepreneurs-outlook-for-software-startups-is-as-good-or-bad-as-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-44460</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Perez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=8736#comment-44460</guid>
		<description>I heard pretty much the same story at an Angel&#039;s panel on Monday night (1/12).

One thing HAS changed: valuations are much lower now.  They said to expect to give up 30% for $1-2M from Angels and 50% for $5M from VCs.  What that tells me is that now more than ever you should try do as much as possible with your own sweat capital and go for the big boost only when you have a position to negotiate the valuation.  We work with really small start ups, and several of our clients are doing just that.

The other possibility is to look at Y Combinator and others like it that do pre-Angel funding.  They seem to be a better fit if all you and your team needs is enough cash to survive for a few months and good advice from people who&#039;ve &quot;been there, done that.&quot; (I don&#039;t have anything to do with YC, I just think it is a good option.)

cheers -- matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard pretty much the same story at an Angel’s panel on Monday night (1/12).</p>
<p>One thing HAS changed: valuations are much lower now.  They said to expect to give up 30% for $1-2M from Angels and 50% for $5M from VCs.  What that tells me is that now more than ever you should try do as much as possible with your own sweat capital and go for the big boost only when you have a position to negotiate the valuation.  We work with really small start ups, and several of our clients are doing just that.</p>
<p>The other possibility is to look at Y Combinator and others like it that do pre-Angel funding.  They seem to be a better fit if all you and your team needs is enough cash to survive for a few months and good advice from people who’ve “been there, done that.” (I don’t have anything to do with YC, I just think it is a good option.)</p>
<p>cheers — matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

