<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grounded in Reality, Maxwell Technology’s CEO Dispels Static Around Ultracapacitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/san-diego/2008/12/04/grounded-in-reality-maxwell-technologys-ceo-dispels-static-around-ultracapacitors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/san-diego/2008/12/04/grounded-in-reality-maxwell-technologys-ceo-dispels-static-around-ultracapacitors/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krassen Dimitrov</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/san-diego/2008/12/04/grounded-in-reality-maxwell-technologys-ceo-dispels-static-around-ultracapacitors/comment-page-1/#comment-42060</link>
		<dc:creator>Krassen Dimitrov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=6647#comment-42060</guid>
		<description>Mr. Blakeslee,
if EESTOR can deliver at scale it will indeed be the game changer, considering that what they have demonstrated translates into effective volumetric energy density equaling that of gasoline. (essentially, an EESTOR capacitor could fuel a car the same distance as would a tank of gasoline with the same volume. The nominal energy density is five times lower, however, an EV is 5x more efficient than an ICE-based car. Also, even though the volumes will be similar, the barrium titenate capacitor will be 10x heavier, but that&#039;s not so important)

However, some of the points that the Maxwell&#039;s CEO makes are valid. It is indeed a &quot;lightning in a bottle&quot;, as these capacitors have low surface area and the high energy density comes from the extremely high potential (~1500V). EESTOR better deliver a well developed discharge circuitry with their product or not many would dare design around something giving you 1500V.

Best wishes,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Blakeslee,<br />
if EESTOR can deliver at scale it will indeed be the game changer, considering that what they have demonstrated translates into effective volumetric energy density equaling that of gasoline. (essentially, an EESTOR capacitor could fuel a car the same distance as would a tank of gasoline with the same volume. The nominal energy density is five times lower, however, an EV is 5x more efficient than an ICE-based car. Also, even though the volumes will be similar, the barrium titenate capacitor will be 10x heavier, but that’s not so important)</p>
<p>However, some of the points that the Maxwell’s CEO makes are valid. It is indeed a “lightning in a bottle”, as these capacitors have low surface area and the high energy density comes from the extremely high potential (~1500V). EESTOR better deliver a well developed discharge circuitry with their product or not many would dare design around something giving you 1500V.</p>
<p>Best wishes,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Blakeslee</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/san-diego/2008/12/04/grounded-in-reality-maxwell-technologys-ceo-dispels-static-around-ultracapacitors/comment-page-1/#comment-41988</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Blakeslee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=6647#comment-41988</guid>
		<description>Sorry the article is so general. I wish you had specifically discussed barium titinate, which EESTOR uses. Sounds like a typical not-invented-here defensiveness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry the article is so general. I wish you had specifically discussed barium titinate, which EESTOR uses. Sounds like a typical not-invented-here defensiveness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minding Your Business &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thursday Morning Business Briefing</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/san-diego/2008/12/04/grounded-in-reality-maxwell-technologys-ceo-dispels-static-around-ultracapacitors/comment-page-1/#comment-41899</link>
		<dc:creator>Minding Your Business &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thursday Morning Business Briefing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=6647#comment-41899</guid>
		<description>[...] * Tri-City Medical Center approves $2 million in bonuses * Running near empty, Overland Storage may be sign of the times * Dispelling static about ultracapacitors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] * Tri-City Medical Center approves $2 million in bonuses * Running near empty, Overland Storage may be sign of the times * Dispelling static about ultracapacitors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

