The Leaning Tower of Ping: How iTunes Could Be Apple’s Undoing

9/3/10Follow @wroush

(Page 4 of 4)

consistent organizational scheme or design paradigm. The iTunes interface has not been fundamentally overhauled since the days when the program was merely a music manager. So with each new media type that’s added to the menagerie, the iTunes screens grow more confusing. Compare, for example, the way the program displays your songs, movies, TV episodes, podcasts, lectures, books, apps, ringtones, and streaming radio stations. In one category, you get a simple list view. In another, you get a list with thumbnails. In a third, you just see thumbnail or icons. It’s an information architect’s nightmare.

Then there’s the problem of how iTunes manages the actual media files behind all these lists. If you’ve ever tried to manually copy, move, or back up your iTunes media library, you know how difficult it is just to find the stuff on your hard drive, let alone show iTunes where it is once you’ve moved it. And can anyone explain to me why iTunes puts movies, podcasts, TV shows, and voice memos into subfolders of the “iTunes Music” folder, mixing them up with individual music albums, while mobile apps are in a separate folder on the same level as iTunes Music? And why is it that I can I use iTunes to synchronize my mobile and desktop calendars and address books, but to synchronize my photo albums, I have to fire up a separate program, iPhoto?

The only antidote for software cruft, alas, is to start fresh. As Stephenson writes:

At some point, one must ask the question: is this really worth it…? Should we throw another human wave of structural engineers at stabilizing the Leaning Tower of Pisa, or should we just let the damn thing fall over and build a tower that doesn’t suck? Like an upgrade to an old building, cruft always seems like a good idea when the first layers of it go on—just routine maintenance, sound prudent management. This is especially true if (as it were) you never look into the cellar, or behind the drywall. But if you are a hacker who spends all his time looking at it from that point of view, cruft is fundamentally disgusting, and you can’t avoid wanting to go after it with a crowbar. Or, better yet, simply walk out of the building—let the Leaning Tower of Pisa fall over—and go make a new one THAT DOESN’T LEAN.

As a daily user of iTunes, I feel like one of those hackers. I just want to go after the program with a crowbar. Better yet, I want Apple to build something new. And my bet is that Apple’s engineers feel the same urge. But given everything the company has riding on iTunes, the idea of rebuilding the program from scratch (or more likely, breaking it into several programs, in order to bring some logic to the media management madness) must seem incredibly risky and ambitious.

We all know what can happen when such projects go bad—can anyone say Windows Vista? So, instead, Apple will just keep adding cruft, until, at some point around iTunes 11 or 12 or 13, the program will simply suffer a total musical meltdown, like HAL doing his rendition of “Daisy, Daisy.”

Or perhaps there’s a way out. I am optimistic about Apple TV, which, as Jobs emphasized in his keynote, is deliberately designed to be un-computer-like. Asking users to navigate an iTunes-like interface using just a tiny remote control would be patently ridiculous—and because the Apple TV is a streaming device, rather than a storage device, there’s less need for all that complexity anyway. So the Apple TV navigation screens are a model of stripped-down simplicity. They’re reminiscent of, but even simpler than, the mobile versions of iTunes (meaning the iPhone, iPod, and iPad versions).

As more and more people get used to the TV and touchscreen approaches to media management, Apple may come under increasing pressure to port this kind of simplicity back to the Mac and Windows versions of iTunes. That’s my hope, anyway. The sooner Apple demolishes iTunes and builds a new software tower as the hub for its nifty complex of media devices, the happier I’ll be.

For a full list of my columns, check out the World Wide Wade Archive. You can also subscribe to the column via RSS or e-mail, and you can download Pixel Nation, an e-book version of the first 80 columns, as a free PDF file or a $4.99 Kindle edition.

Wade Roush is Xconomy's chief correspondent and editor of Xconomy San Francisco. You can e-mail him at wroush@xconomy.com. Follow @wroush

Single PageCurrently on Page: 1 2 3 4 previous page
  • Pingback: Apple’s weakest link is at its core | SCOT NETWORK

  • Pingback: The ever-growing iTunes basket | NoteTechnology

  • Pingback: Tell You A Secret – Even With Facebook Integration, Ping Will Still Be A Disaster

  • Pingback: Tell You A Secret ? Even With Facebook Integration, Ping Will Still Be A Disaster | Buy the Touch

  • Pingback: Tell You A Secret – Even With Facebook Integration, Ping Will Still Be A Disaster : startupblock.com

  • Pingback: Tell You A Secret – Even With Facebook Integration, Ping Will Still Be A Disaster | KaakoTech

  • Pingback: The ever-growing iTunes basket

  • Pingback: YallaGeeks » Apple’s weakest link is at its core

  • Pingback: Mary Schmidt Marketing Troubleshooter » Does this computer make me look fat?

  • Steve

    I wholly agree with everything mentioned in this article.

    The current iTunes software needs to be revamped. The problem is, Apple doesn’t see the need to since they have no direct competition. iTunes is core, so what would replace it? An updated version of iTunes would. Unfortunately, I don’t see this happening in the near or distant future.

    With the addition of Ping my hopes for a somewhat useful feature was raised, however, upon using it, it really did lack some crucial social networking features.

    The inability to add twitter-esq or blog-ish entries is the most notable. Facebook integration would have been amazing, but come on lets face it, Apple wouldn’t shell out additional money to have that feature (We all know Facebook would want to capitalize on that kind of relationship).

    I also find “pinging” or “liking” music that is only available to iTunes a little limiting. It seems that if you are not going to the iTunes store as frequent as Apple wants you to, they’re using this as another medium to obtain your money.

  • Steve

    @Rebecca Zacks: I’ll even throw in the executive extra-beef flavored bone!

  • Pingback: Tell You A Secret – Even With Facebook Integration, Ping Will Still Be A Disaster | WordPress

  • ARil

    Macs were solid worthwhile computers with heart while most of you were waiting in line for Windows 95. Then around the time of ipod they transformed from being a maker of computers to consumer electronics. Everything since has made them into the new microsoft. But like Target is to Walmart people think they are tasteful and discerning. I type all this while my imac is slower than my two previous ones due to all the bloatware and processes running in the background.

  • http://twitter.com/z00m3r z00m3r

    Whew. On the one hand, this is a fairly well-written article, from the literary-technical standpoint, ignoring the subject matter. I enjoyed the Neal Stephenson references.

    OTOH, jeez, what a long-winded cranky pants! Yes, iTunes isn’t perfect, is getting a little chubby, and could use an overhaul. Maybe, though, Roush should learn how to use a Mac! A few of his complaints suggest he has a basic ignorance of how iTunes and the Finder interact, for one thing.

    I’m guessing most people find iTunes’ learning curve pretty reasonable; I like that it’s something like database software, allowing you a wide variety of choices in accessing & organizing your media collection. You learn as much of the program as you need to. For instance, I think Cover Flow is a really cool thing to show off to Windoze/non-Apple’ware users, but I’ve never used it after the first couple months.

    BTW, comparing iTunes to an architectural/esthetic marvel, a cultural icon hundreds of years old, is clever but pointless.

    Nevertheless, some good suggestions for improvements. As for Ping, I’m in no hurry…

  • http://twitter.com/z00m3r z00m3r

    Come to think of it, I’m still happily using iTunes 9.2.1, and I’m in no hurry to update that, Ping or no Ping. Sometimes you just gotta say ‘no’ to the latest update, or at least read a few articles & reviews before making the leap!

  • Pingback: Year end link clean up « A Little Ludwig Goes A Long Way

  • Pingback: BANDNESS Blog » Ping – Luthiers Tecnológicos

  • allele77

    On the whole topic of the iTunes monopoly, they’ve done a not-so-bad implementation for music, but the iTunes University experience has recently gone from bad to worse (as of the late 2010 update). I suppose people who use iTunes primarily for iTunes University just don’t matter!

    They’ve seriously broken the interface so that you can’t see all the courses by year like you used to be able to. You can’t browse by department like you used to be able to. Furthermore, once you download some university’s half-baked attempt to upload their coursework, half the time the lectures are in some random order, or sorted alphabetically by title! You have to intuit the order somehow, and even then you can’t easily change the order once you’ve done so — you’ve got to “hack” the structure on your hard drive or keep a list of the derived order and select the lectures one by one. Furthermore, there’s no mapping between the title of the course in the “iTunes Store” and how it shows up in your library under “iTunes U” — so you have to keep clicking back and forth between the two views to FIND your videos. When you sync to iPhone, there’s a third mapping that doesn’t always agree with the other two!

    Don’t get me wrong – I love it when it works! It just seems like their new format made a difficult task even more difficult! Just so you know that I’ve put in my hours on this – my recreated library is over 400 GB and I’ve listened to over 50 complete courses and dabbled in hundreds of others. I just resent the amount of time I have to spend to correct for the horrible interface, the lack of attention universities pay to organizing their classes so someone can view them (other than the kids actually attending school so they know what course to watch), and the inability to fix the mistakes in title, order, and grouping other than applying disk-based hacks that rely upon how iTunes works internally (and is therefore subject to change!).

  • Pingback: iPad News : The ever-growing iTunes basket

  • Pingback: iPhone News : The ever-growing iTunes basket

  • Pingback: Apple’s weakest link is at its core | Richard Hartley

  • Pingback: Itunes « taylor’s blog

  • Pingback: Amazon Looking to “Rapidly Grow” Digital Music Team - J.B. Greenhut

  • Pingback: Lady AppApp, The Sassy Side of iPhone Apps

  • Pingback: Apple’s PING, duidelijk geen PONG « Ambatchdotcom seocontest

    

Business, life sciences, and technology news — covering Boston, Seattle, San Diego, Detroit, San Francisco, New York and beyond.

© 2007-2012, Xconomy, Inc. Xconomy is a registered service mark of Xconomy, Inc. All rights reserved.

Site produced by Andrew Koyfman with design from Rob Hunter.