<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Manifesto for Speed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/national/2009/08/28/a-manifesto-for-speed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/national/2009/08/28/a-manifesto-for-speed/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Roth</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/national/2009/08/28/a-manifesto-for-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-77942</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Roth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=39274#comment-77942</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m happy to see voices of reason popping up here and there among the din of &quot;information overload is destroying your brain&quot; messages.  I&#039;m not saying there isn&#039;t an issue here that needs to be managed and that many people don&#039;t have dysfunctional message processes.  I use reason to mean applying skepticism and objectivity (as Chris does above pointing out each person has a different environment).  Information overload comes across too often with evangelical zeal.  That&#039;s why I recommend avoiding the &quot;information overload&quot; term and its negative associtations entirely and describe it in terms of a management issue (enterprise attention management).

More on the &quot;attention management&quot; tag of my blog:
 http://knowledgeforward.wordpress.com/category/attention-management/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m happy to see voices of reason popping up here and there among the din of “information overload is destroying your brain” messages.  I’m not saying there isn’t an issue here that needs to be managed and that many people don’t have dysfunctional message processes.  I use reason to mean applying skepticism and objectivity (as Chris does above pointing out each person has a different environment).  Information overload comes across too often with evangelical zeal.  That’s why I recommend avoiding the “information overload” term and its negative associtations entirely and describe it in terms of a management issue (enterprise attention management).</p>
<p>More on the “attention management” tag of my blog:<br />
 <a href="http://knowledgeforward.wordpress.com/category/attention-management/" rel="nofollow">http://knowledgeforward.wordpress.com/category/attention-management/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Noble</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/national/2009/08/28/a-manifesto-for-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-77932</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=39274#comment-77932</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re all different aren&#039;t we? For me, 5 days in a row of constant interruptions &amp; information, followed by 2 days of being unplugged, works well. Freemen seems to need a different environment. The key is figuring out what environment works for you and how to find it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’re all different aren’t we? For me, 5 days in a row of constant interruptions &amp; information, followed by 2 days of being unplugged, works well. Freemen seems to need a different environment. The key is figuring out what environment works for you and how to find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Ghormley</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/national/2009/08/28/a-manifesto-for-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-77931</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ghormley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=39274#comment-77931</guid>
		<description>Right on, Wade.  
Caffeine + Cable + Communication at light speed = Exponential Connection to a Compelling Cosmos (more poetry, too) 
I learned the &quot;bliss of the empty in box&quot; from Bruce Bullen, now acting CEO at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care.
Bruce actually takes it a step further -- he never leaves for home until his ENTIRE inbox is less than one screen in length, which means he opens and processes all but a dozen holdover emails daily.  Noting Bruce&#039;s effectiveness when working with him, I try to get to a zero inbox at least 2-3 times a week.  (;-&gt;  Wag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, Wade.<br />
Caffeine + Cable + Communication at light speed = Exponential Connection to a Compelling Cosmos (more poetry, too)<br />
I learned the “bliss of the empty in box” from Bruce Bullen, now acting CEO at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care.<br />
Bruce actually takes it a step further — he never leaves for home until his ENTIRE inbox is less than one screen in length, which means he opens and processes all but a dozen holdover emails daily.  Noting Bruce’s effectiveness when working with him, I try to get to a zero inbox at least 2-3 times a week.  (;-&gt;  Wag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

