How I Declared E-Mail Bankruptcy, and Discovered the Bliss of an Empty Inbox

2/6/09Follow @wroush

I’m not one of those people who thinks you can measure a person’s power, talent, or importance by the number of e-mails or phone calls they get every day. So it’s not a boast—indeed, it’s more like an embarrassed confession—when I say that by early January, my Gmail inbox had swelled to almost 15,000 messages. And that was before we at Xconomy decided to tack our e-mail addresses at the bottom of every story so readers can contact us more easily. I don’t regret that policy—it’s brought me quite a few good story tips already. But it did mean that unanswered messages started to pile up even faster, threatening to smother me in guilt and anxiety.

It was finally time to do something about my e-mail problem. For help, I turned to two trusted sources. The first was executive coach Stever Robbins, aka the “Get It Done Guy,” who I met last July at Podcamp Boston (read the interview here). Stever records a weekly podcast full of great advice about staying sane, and even having fun, as you strive to be more productive and accomplish your goals. I remembered that in one of Stever’s early podcasts, he’d responded to a listener who was desperate for tips about dealing with his backlog of e-mail.

So I went back and listened again. For serious cases of e-mail constipation, Stever suggested the radical action of “declaring e-mail bankruptcy.” Specifically, he told the listener: “Delete it all. Then send a form letter to everyone who wrote saying, ‘My backlog was too big to manage. To cope, I’ve deleted everything. Please resend anything important.’”

Something about this idea really scared me; it seemed awfully close to thumbing your nose at everyone on your contact list. But it also seemed to offer me a way out of my personal e-mail morass. There was simply no way I was ever going to work my way through a 15,000-message backlog—not even if I devoted several weekends to the task. The idea grew on me when I found out that some pretty distinguished figures, like Stanford law professor and free-expression guru Lawrence Lessig and venture capitalist Fred Wilson, had gone through e-mail bankruptcies and survived with their careers intact.

So, 11 days ago, on January 26, I took a deep breath and sent this note to my heaviest e-mail correspondents:

I have waited far too long, but tonight I’m going to clean out my Gmail inbox—which has nearly 15,000 messages in it!!—by archiving everything (in other words, moving it into the “All Mail” folder). Apologies in advance, but if you sent me a note recently that requires some immediate response, please ping me again, because all of my old messages are going into the archive. It’s the only way I’m ever going to get my inbox cleaned out.

Then I did what I was threatening to do, and archived all 15,000 messages. Of course, as my boss, Bob, immediately pointed out, all I was really doing was changing the way these e-mails are categorized in Gmail, not truly euthanizing them. I would never just delete all that mail, because for better or worse, Gmail has become one of the main storehouses of my digital life. (Which is obviously what Google wants, or they wouldn’t be giving me 7,292 megabytes of free online storage.) The messages are still there, still searchable, if I need to reconstruct a conversation later. So, in a way, it’s all semantics.

Despite the sleight-of-hand nature of my “bankruptcy,” though, emptying out my inbox brought an immediate sensation of lightness and freedom. Safely tucked away in the archive, those messages were no longer pleading in 15,000 whiny electronic voices for me to do something about them. I’d discovered the sweetest three words in the English language: “No new mail!”

Of course, the feeling only lasted about two minutes, until the next message popped onto the screen. Clearly, declaring e-mail bankruptcy was only half of the solution. I also needed a way to keep my inbox from overflowing again. And for that, I turned to another trusted source, Mark Hurst.

Mark is the founder of Creative Good, a New York-based user interface design and consulting firm, and the author of Bit Literacy, a primer on handling information overload. I first talked with Mark a few years ago when I was writing about Web-based time management tools; he has written a particularly effective one called Gootodo. He’s an incredibly nice guy, and even offered to … Next Page »

Wade Roush is a contributing editor at Xconomy. Follow @wroush

Single Page Currently on Page: 1 2

By posting a comment, you agree to our terms and conditions.

  • Tracey

    Wade-
    Check out Fusion-io if you haven’t already- Steve Wozniak stepped up recently and tech is intriguing…might not be around for long before its acquired by the likes of Dell (an investor) or EMC.

  • http://inboxdetox.com Marsha Egan

    Hi Wade,
    Great discovery, and I’m glad you found success in taking that inbox to zero every day.

    To tag on to your learnings, it is helpful to view your going into your inbox as a “sort” effort rather than a “handle ‘em all” effort. Just like you handle paper mail, not all must be handled immediately. The triaging is what helps you get things done.

    So I like to sugggest that anything you decide requires more work is dragged and dropped into another folder, called “Action.” Then, set a diary for it, either electronically or in your planner.

    Then, once a day, view all your tasks, including your diaries, and plan that day. You find the tasks in that “action” folder. This actually works. Might be worth a try.

  • http://mama45.com george girton

    Great idea, to respond to personal messages first. And if you include the text of the message, it still stays in your “Sent Items” folder, and you can delete it from the inbox.

    I used to use my inbox as a humongous database combined with a (badly organized) todo list. I tried Mark’s web page for six months, and it was pretty doggone good but then I got what for me was a simpler program for my Mac and iPhone called “Things”. My life at the moment doesn’t depend on email followups enough for mark’s webpage to be the best thing, but if you do, then yes!

    I still keep on deleting that email, though, as it comes in. I love getting it down to zero.

  • Charles Hill

    What I do is never let my inbox so big I have to scroll or flip the page. If it get close, I stop and dedicate time to cleaning it out.

    Then I follow similar rules.

    1. Family first. These are almost always quick.
    2. Trash all chain letters and FYIs
    3. Delegate or answer others.

    My inbox IS my to-do list. If it isn’t filed, it is a to-do. Once done, it is filed.

  • http://www.xconomy.com/author/wroush/ Wade Roush

    @Charles, I used to do the same sort of thing, but I wound up with 15,000 to-do items. Something had to give. I guess you could just as easily say I declared to-do bankruptcy.

    Also, my inbox gets so big that I have to scroll or flip the page about 3 times a day. So I have to be relentless about cleaning it out.

  • http://www.bankruptcytipsadvice.info Per Jonsson

    I do the same as Charles. Never let the inbox grow so I have to scroll or flip page. The inbox seems to never get tired :)

  • http://www.sunshineagain.com Heather

    Good work. Now dump your Blackberry and all other cell phones, and go back to a simple land line and answering machine, and see how sweet life was intended to be. Cell phoneless Gen X girl (and loving it), Heather

  • Pingback: Swedes Fall Under the Spell of the Empty Inbox | Travels with Rhody

  • Rob

    I would HIGHLY recommend using the “labels” function in Gmail….it can be a life saver for sorting and organizing mail. Just using half a dozen or so can help you screen out and prioritize mail on the fly….allowing for much faster “down to zero” time on your email inbox purge every day.

    Who knows, maybe it will even help you sort out those 15,000 “dead” emails you put in the “All Mail” graveyard?!?!

  • http://www.xconomy.com/author/wroush/ Wade Roush

    @Rob: Sure, I already use labels for many categories of mail — I have filters set up to put labels on e-mails from family or from Xconomy colleagues, for example. But can you say more about how you use labels to speed up e-mail management? Ideally I’d love to do what all the gurus say, and “touch” every e-mail no more than once. I guess labels would help me decide to trash some e-mails without even looking at them — but do you have something more complex in mind? Thanks.

    Good piece by Scott Kirsner in the Boston Globe about all this, incidentally:

    Avoiding Inbox Overload: Advice on Better Managing E-mail
    http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2009/10/avoiding_inbox_overload_advice.html

  • Pingback: best practices in e-mail management | biolingual

  • Pingback: Alex’s News Picks: October 15th | Mark Peter Davis

  • Pingback: 7 Ways We Can Work Together to Restore E-Mail Sanity | Xconomy

  • Pingback: 6 Secrets to Slaying the E-Mail Monster | Xconomy