Terrafugia Unveils New TF-X Project, Talks Future of Flying Cars

5/6/13Follow @gthuang

Yes, this company makes a flying car. And apparently, it works—at least the prototype does. Now how about this, a little further down the road: a self-flying car.

Perhaps we’re getting ahead of ourselves here. But what if the technology were feasible?

Here’s the thing: it could be. In fact, some observers predict we’ll have self-flying commuter vehicles before we have fully self-driving cars (like the Google car). This won’t happen overnight—both technologies are at least 10 to 15 years away from prime time—but if you think about it, commercial airplanes pretty much fly themselves for most of the trip. And flying vehicles don’t face the same hazards that cars do—pedestrians, other cars, traffic signals, bad roads—though they do have their own safety issues (like falling from the sky).

With that backdrop, a Boston-area company is trying to seize momentum in the global race to reinvent personal aviation. Terrafugia, based in Woburn, MA, has unveiled a radical concept for its second product. Called TF-X, the futuristic vehicle will be a four-seat, hybrid-electric flying car, with vertical takeoff and landing capabilities (see image above). And—oh yeah—it will pretty much fly itself.

“You’ll tell it where you want to go, and it sends you on that course and can automatically compensate for changes in conditions,” says Carl Dietrich, Terrafugia’s co-founder, CEO, and chief technology officer (now that’s a startup). “This could open up personal aviation for all of humanity,” he says.

Let’s back up for a minute. Terrafugia was founded by MIT grads in 2006 with the grand idea of developing the first commercially available flying car—they originally called it a “roadable aircraft.” (My colleague Wade Roush first wrote about the company in 2008.) That first product, called Transition, was designed for private pilots to be able to land on an airport runway, fold up the wings in less than a minute, and drive right out onto public roads.

But a funny thing happened on the way to the airport. After seven years of work, Terrafugia has yet to ship its first product. Chalk it up to many issues: tweaking the technical design; clearing regulatory hurdles in both the automotive and aviation industries; and running lean. Still, the firm has come a long way on just over $10 million in financing from angel investors (plus $1.25 million in defense money).

“It wasn’t getting it into the air that was the hard part,” Dietrich says, referring to the flight tests. “It’s the stuff after. I do believe it will pay off in the end.”

Terrafugia has finished flight tests on two prototype Transition vehicles, and is in the process of crash-testing the design (on the ground) with a big-company partner. The Woburn firm currently has more than a hundred pre-orders for the craft, at $279,000 a pop. That will add up to over $27 million in sales—once the vehicles are delivered. That will be sometime between January 2015 and March 2016, Dietrich says. (The date has been pushed back several times.)

On a recent visit to the company, Dietrich showed me the Transition prototype and its cockpit controls, while a small team of engineers tested a (very loud) engine outdoors (see photos).

As for most startups, the key for Terrafugia is to survive long enough to get to market and make an impact. It also needs to lay out a clearer vision for its future—which is why it’s talking now, even with customers still waiting. “The company made it through a really challenging economic time,” Dietrich says. “We’re getting a lot more investment interest now.”

Indeed, Terrafugia will need to raise more money to reach its goals. The firm is actively expanding its current staff of about 22 people, mostly engineers. “We’re looking to accelerate completion of the Transition. We’re seeing a light at the end of the tunnel,” Dietrich says. “As Transition work wraps up, we’ll be moving our guys over to TF-X.”

So what about that new design? None of it is … Next Page »

Gregory T. Huang is Xconomy's Deputy Editor, National IT Editor, and the Editor of Xconomy Boston. You can e-mail him at gthuang@xconomy.com or call him at 617-252-7323. Follow @gthuang

Single Page Currently on Page: 1 2 3

By posting a comment, you agree to our terms and conditions.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1257663063 Charles Beyer

    I can’t wait for these to hit the market!

    • Ray

      It’s never going to happen. Do you know how much work goes into making sure the planes that are currently in the air from crashing into each other in the air on on the strip? Multiply that by about a few million cars and you’ll have a disaster in the making

      • http://www.facebook.com/doodly.stuudmuffin Doodly Stuudmuffin

        Yeah. And I imagine drunk drivers crashing down onto the rest of us. Great.

  • flukes

    “They promised us flying cars. Instead we got 140 characters.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Art-Salmons/100001016539462 Art Salmons

    I hope they’re good at engineering, because they’re BAD at concept art.

  • Walter Jeffries

    Flying cars are a really bad idea. As shown by the accident reports the vast majority of people can not handle driving in two dimensions. Add another dimension and the accident rate will skyrocket. Add altitude and speed and the death rate will climb even more dramatically. Perhaps we should consider this evolution at work. Call the car “Darwin”.

    • http://www.facebook.com/TomEWilliams Tom Williams

      Hopefully with this people would rely on the self-flying aspect much more than manual controls.

  • Laughing Skeptic

    Clearly this thing can’t fly slowly, which makes it very dangerous as a commuter vehicle. I don’t see a mention of a ballistic parachute, without one a power failure will result in a certain fatal crash. A CarterCopter makes way more sense for point-to-point commuting.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dokidokinyannyan Dokidoki Nyannyan

    I saw 2 self-driving cars in the span of 5 minutes today and yet I saw 0 self-flying cars.

  • zdaxxy

    This is still using dated technology. How about working towards anti-gravity devices.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeremy-Keller/1549884122 Jeremy Keller

    I think the TF-X is my favourite flying car to date, despite being just a concept. I would therefore like it to enter commercial production in the not too distant future, and not have to wait till next decade for it. I think CG should be able to see to that.
    Furthermore, the Maverick, referred to as the flying car that does, already appears to be on the market. I would now like such technology to catch on, and catch on in style. I think the Maverick resembles a pre-war racing car to some extent. I therefore think Terrafugia should design their answer to the Maverick. I don’t really think the 40mph top air speed is much of a handicap.
    I am very much in favour of flying cars and would even like them and flying cars to displace the conventional aeroplanes and helicopters altogether, except perhaps for special occasions.
    I am featured on the BBC website and anxious to bring my weblinks to everyone’s attention. To find me on Facebook just search for:
    car
    flying car
    Maverick
    Caravella Aerospace
    Samson Motorworks
    Plane Driven
    solar system
    Martian rovers
    Spirit
    Opportunity
    Kepler 22-b
    Robots
    Roboy
    The Shard

  • jeremykeller

    On the 9th of August of 2012 I dreamt that a lorry could be transformed into a passenger aircraft using the hidden wings it had. I believe it was supposed to offer a service to Ireland.
    At the time I was convinced the technology had finally arrived. I was therefore later disappointed to learn that it was just a dream.

  • jeremykeller

    Will the TF-X really enter commercial production next decade? After all, was the de Havilland Comet unveiled as a concept back in 1940? Visually the TF-X is my favourite flying car to date, despite being just a concept. But what makes Terrafugia think it’ll be commercially successful? So many flying car ventures seem to have failed in the past. Furthermore, I do believe the Moller Skycar was already a concept back in 1999.

    I am very much in favour of flying cars and would even like flying cars and flying saucers to displace the conventional aeroplanes and helicopters altogether, except perhaps for special occasions.

    Already the Maverick, referred to as the flying car that does, seems to work. I would therefore like the technology to catch on, and catch on in style. I certainly don’t think the 40mph air speed should be considered a handicap. I therefore think the flying cars using the Maverick technology should resemble the pre-war racing cars, but with extra seats.
    I am featured on the BBC website and anxious to bring my weblinks to everyone’s attention. To find me on Facebook just search for:
    car
    flying car
    Maverick
    plane driven
    Terrafugia
    martian rovers
    solar system
    Auto Express
    Euro NCAP
    Rolls-Royce
    Kepler 22-b
    Cessna
    robots
    Roboy
    Austin 7