<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revolutionary Angels Defends Business Plan Competition Amidst Widespread Criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/30/revolutionary-angels-defends-business-plan-competition-amidst-widespread-criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/30/revolutionary-angels-defends-business-plan-competition-amidst-widespread-criticism/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revolutionary Angels – Round II &#124; Seth Levine</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/30/revolutionary-angels-defends-business-plan-competition-amidst-widespread-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-117578</link>
		<dc:creator>Revolutionary Angels – Round II &#124; Seth Levine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=52498#comment-117578</guid>
		<description>[...] technology magazine Xconomy wrote an article yesterday that focused on the controversy surrounding Boston based Revolutionary Angels &#8211; the angel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] technology magazine Xconomy wrote an article yesterday that focused on the controversy surrounding Boston based Revolutionary Angels – the angel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/30/revolutionary-angels-defends-business-plan-competition-amidst-widespread-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-100627</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=52498#comment-100627</guid>
		<description>Wow, $5000 to evaluate just a business plan. The nonprofit I work for, Winning Workplaces, does an annual small business competition where we evaluate many aspects of the workplace culture and business metrics -- everything from # employees and % minorities, to benefits offerings and leadership development -- and we&#039;re charging only $100 for a comprehensive 7-page online application. Granted, the prize in our case is being featured in Inc. Magazine, and not cash, but that still seems unattainable for the vast majority of startup or pre-startup phase entrepreneurs. Thanks for posting this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, $5000 to evaluate just a business plan. The nonprofit I work for, Winning Workplaces, does an annual small business competition where we evaluate many aspects of the workplace culture and business metrics — everything from # employees and % minorities, to benefits offerings and leadership development — and we’re charging only $100 for a comprehensive 7-page online application. Granted, the prize in our case is being featured in Inc. Magazine, and not cash, but that still seems unattainable for the vast majority of startup or pre-startup phase entrepreneurs. Thanks for posting this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan shimel</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/30/revolutionary-angels-defends-business-plan-competition-amidst-widespread-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-95549</link>
		<dc:creator>alan shimel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=52498#comment-95549</guid>
		<description>While I don&#039;t necessarily agree with this model, all of the VCs gnashing their teeth about the injustice to the poor entrepreneur is not doing it. Ultimately the market will determine if this is a viable model with customers who are getting enough value to buy the 5k lottery ticket. I have written more at my blog http://www.ashimmy.com/2009/12/is-there-room-for-another-model-in-the-vc-investment-world.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I don’t necessarily agree with this model, all of the VCs gnashing their teeth about the injustice to the poor entrepreneur is not doing it. Ultimately the market will determine if this is a viable model with customers who are getting enough value to buy the 5k lottery ticket. I have written more at my blog <a href="http://www.ashimmy.com/2009/12/is-there-room-for-another-model-in-the-vc-investment-world.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ashimmy.com/2009/12/is-there-room-for-another-model-in-the-vc-investment-world.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seth</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/30/revolutionary-angels-defends-business-plan-competition-amidst-widespread-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-95506</link>
		<dc:creator>seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=52498#comment-95506</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve posted some thoughts on Hurley&#039;s response over on my blog: http://fndry.gr/790Z</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve posted some thoughts on Hurley’s response over on my blog: <a href="http://fndry.gr/790Z" rel="nofollow">http://fndry.gr/790Z</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Mendelson</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/30/revolutionary-angels-defends-business-plan-competition-amidst-widespread-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-95382</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Mendelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=52498#comment-95382</guid>
		<description>Talk is cheap - not worth $5000.  There are plenty of VCs, Angels and experts in the startup ecosystem who are willing to give all of this advice for free, or in the case of groups like Techstars pay the team to give this type of advice in exchange for a small founders share of equity.  This isn&#039;t a new model - it&#039;s been around for years and a rip off is still a rip off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk is cheap – not worth $5000.  There are plenty of VCs, Angels and experts in the startup ecosystem who are willing to give all of this advice for free, or in the case of groups like Techstars pay the team to give this type of advice in exchange for a small founders share of equity.  This isn’t a new model – it’s been around for years and a rip off is still a rip off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew Hession-Kunz</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/11/30/revolutionary-angels-defends-business-plan-competition-amidst-widespread-criticism/comment-page-1/#comment-95371</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Hession-Kunz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=52498#comment-95371</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ve &quot;been there, done that&quot;, but didn&#039;t earn enough money to actually invest. Why would I want their advice? 

Besides, there are plenty of people giving out cheap advice. Get a board. Get some business acquaintances. Get a plan and execute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They’ve “been there, done that”, but didn’t earn enough money to actually invest. Why would I want their advice? </p>
<p>Besides, there are plenty of people giving out cheap advice. Get a board. Get some business acquaintances. Get a plan and execute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

