<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baseball, the Red Sox, and the (Swedish) Innovation Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/09/10/baseball-the-red-sox-and-the-swedish-innovation-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/09/10/baseball-the-red-sox-and-the-swedish-innovation-economy/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baseball in Sweden</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/09/10/baseball-the-red-sox-and-the-swedish-innovation-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-84424</link>
		<dc:creator>Baseball in Sweden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 06:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=40891#comment-84424</guid>
		<description>[...] stumbled across an interesting post on Xconomy today about the Baseball World Cup qualification in Sweden. This got me thinking about the great [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stumbled across an interesting post on Xconomy today about the Baseball World Cup qualification in Sweden. This got me thinking about the great [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Punch</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/09/10/baseball-the-red-sox-and-the-swedish-innovation-economy/comment-page-1/#comment-80999</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Punch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=40891#comment-80999</guid>
		<description>The &quot;ecological niche&quot; issue -- e.g., ice hockey&#039;s success because there was not another winter team sport) is the key.  And it&#039;s related to climate: American summers are often too hot for football in its various forms.

Incidentally, American football and rugby, along with Canadian and Australian Rules football, are versions of the same game.  The real trade-off is rugby-type (hands)games vs. association football (soccer - no hands).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The “ecological niche” issue — e.g., ice hockey’s success because there was not another winter team sport) is the key.  And it’s related to climate: American summers are often too hot for football in its various forms.</p>
<p>Incidentally, American football and rugby, along with Canadian and Australian Rules football, are versions of the same game.  The real trade-off is rugby-type (hands)games vs. association football (soccer – no hands).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

