<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State of New England Venture Quiz: Answers and Commentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/08/05/state-of-new-england-venture-quiz-answers-and-commentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/08/05/state-of-new-england-venture-quiz-answers-and-commentary/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/08/05/state-of-new-england-venture-quiz-answers-and-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-73655</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=36246#comment-73655</guid>
		<description>These results are interesting. If you look at #3, for example, the correct answer was right at the edge of one of the categories. The pie charts don&#039;t provide the granularity necessary to determine how far off the sample population was. In other words, if everyone who voted for 15 - 19 thought it was at the high end of that, they wouldn&#039;t have been statistically wrong.
Also, I&#039;d love to see comparable data for west coast VC investing. Were respondents mostly from one region?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These results are interesting. If you look at #3, for example, the correct answer was right at the edge of one of the categories. The pie charts don’t provide the granularity necessary to determine how far off the sample population was. In other words, if everyone who voted for 15 – 19 thought it was at the high end of that, they wouldn’t have been statistically wrong.<br />
Also, I’d love to see comparable data for west coast VC investing. Were respondents mostly from one region?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/08/05/state-of-new-england-venture-quiz-answers-and-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-73480</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=36246#comment-73480</guid>
		<description>Nice compilation Bob! The actual figures are not at all surprising. Your data suggests that the Boston VC community is comprised of primarily &#039;1 hit wonder&#039; firms who have much more chaff than wheat and rely on luck rather than smarts. It is amazing that any of them can raise a fund given their across-the-board dismal performance both in terms of investment return and ability to nurture company growth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice compilation Bob! The actual figures are not at all surprising. Your data suggests that the Boston VC community is comprised of primarily ’1 hit wonder’ firms who have much more chaff than wheat and rely on luck rather than smarts. It is amazing that any of them can raise a fund given their across-the-board dismal performance both in terms of investment return and ability to nurture company growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

