<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Massachusetts Has “One Foot in the 21st Century, One Foot in the 18th,” Says Attorney General Coakley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/07/28/massachusetts-has-one-foot-in-the-21st-century-one-foot-in-the-18th-says-attorney-general-coakley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/07/28/massachusetts-has-one-foot-in-the-21st-century-one-foot-in-the-18th-says-attorney-general-coakley/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/07/28/massachusetts-has-one-foot-in-the-21st-century-one-foot-in-the-18th-says-attorney-general-coakley/comment-page-1/#comment-81029</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=35410#comment-81029</guid>
		<description>The spirit of Massachusetts is the spirit of America, the spirit of what&#039;s old and what&#039;s new!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spirit of Massachusetts is the spirit of America, the spirit of what’s old and what’s new!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Massachusetts Noncompete Debate &#8211; A New Voice &#171; Trade Secret / Noncompete Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/07/28/massachusetts-has-one-foot-in-the-21st-century-one-foot-in-the-18th-says-attorney-general-coakley/comment-page-1/#comment-72551</link>
		<dc:creator>Massachusetts Noncompete Debate &#8211; A New Voice &#171; Trade Secret / Noncompete Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=35410#comment-72551</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday, the Massachusetts Governor’s Office weighed in through Secretary Gregory Bialecki of the Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development.  Secretary Bialecki’s opinion is, in short, that it would be both premature and the economic climate to make changes in the law.  His comments are available here.  In contrast, Massachusetts Attorney General, Martha Coakley, is reported to have taken a contrary position, noting that Massachusetts noncompete law is “fairly strict” and “has not been upgraded or changed probably since the 1970s, and some of what it does in terms of restrictions on employment was not contemplated for today’s climate.”  (Report here.)  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday, the Massachusetts Governor’s Office weighed in through Secretary Gregory Bialecki of the Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development.  Secretary Bialecki’s opinion is, in short, that it would be both premature and the economic climate to make changes in the law.  His comments are available here.  In contrast, Massachusetts Attorney General, Martha Coakley, is reported to have taken a contrary position, noting that Massachusetts noncompete law is “fairly strict” and “has not been upgraded or changed probably since the 1970s, and some of what it does in terms of restrictions on employment was not contemplated for today’s climate.”  (Report here.)  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

