Xconomy Boston

Massachusetts Has “One Foot in the 21st Century, One Foot in the 18th,” Says Attorney General Coakley

Wade Roush7/28/09Comments (2)

(Page 2 of 2)

Massachusetts has “a fairly strict statute that has not been upgraded or changed probably since the 1970s, and some of what it does in terms of restrictions on employment was not contemplated for today’s climate.”

Changing the law could be a slow process, she said. “Unlike California, Massachusetts has one foot in the twenty-first century and one foot in the eighteenth,” Coakley said. Still, she said, change was possible. “If the perception is—and the perception can become the actuality—that Massachusetts is overly burdensome to individual innovators, and therefore companies don’t come here or stay here, that is a problem for us.”

The discussion also ranged to the role of state government and universities in educating the public about technology; the best ways for academic researchers to make sure that their findings are reflected in public policy; the need for cybersecurity measures and emergency exercises at the state level; healthcare reform and electronic medical records; and the need for ongoing regulatory reform to benefit small businesses.

John Ciccarelli, the associate vice chancellor for government relations, public affairs, and economic development at UMass Boston, congratulated Coakley for putting real resources behind promises about reform to lower regulatory hurdles. Under Coakley’s predecessor, nobody even answered the phones at the Attorney General’s Office’s regulatory reform division, Ciccarelli said. “Now you have two people answering the phone, he said. Coakley said her focus was less on getting old, outdated regulations off the books than on making sure that any new ones that go into effect are clear.

In closing, Coakley said she hoped the meeting would lead to “further fruitful collaboration” between business and university leaders and her office. “My phone is open, my door is open,” she said.

Wade Roush is Xconomy's chief correspondent and editor of Xconomy San Francisco. You can e-mail him at wroush@xconomy.com or follow him on Twitter at twitter.com/wroush.

Single PageCurrently on Page: 1 2 previous page

Add Your Thoughts

You will have 10 minutes to edit your post after you press publish.

Comments may be edited for clarity and length, rejected, or deleted.
By clicking "Publish," you are agreeing to these Terms and Conditions.

Comments (2)

  • Peter Griffin

    9/11/09 3:24 pm

    The spirit of Massachusetts is the spirit of America, the spirit of what’s old and what’s new!

Links to This Post

  • Massachusetts Noncompete Debate – A New Voice « Trade Secret / Noncompete Blog

    7/29/09 10:30 am

    [...] Yesterday, the Massachusetts Governor’s Office weighed in through Secretary Gregory Bialecki of the Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development.  Secretary Bialecki’s opinion is, in short, that it would be both premature and the economic climate to make changes in the law.  His comments are available here.  In contrast, Massachusetts Attorney General, Martha Coakley, is reported to have taken a contrary position, noting that Massachusetts noncompete law is “fairly strict” and “has not been upgraded or changed probably since the 1970s, and some of what it does in terms of restrictions on employment was not contemplated for today’s climate.”  (Report here.)  [...]

    

Business, life sciences, and technology news — covering Boston, Seattle, San Diego, Detroit, San Francisco, New York and beyond.

© 2007-2012, Xconomy, Inc. Xconomy is a registered service mark of Xconomy, Inc. All rights reserved.

Site produced by Andrew Koyfman with design from Rob Hunter.