Going Green, Gradually: Catching Up with Local Motors and Its Crowd-Sourced Car
(Page 2 of 2)
finished body and what would look like a finished chassis. It has a few tubes missing still, but we are on pace for seeing a Rally Fighter on the ground this summer.
X: I’m wondering if you know the folks at Terrafugia, out in Woburn. They recently announced the first flight of their “roadable aircraft,” the Transition. Both of your companies are building new kinds of vehicles—but what strikes me is that Terrafugia is taking a very hands-on, engineering-centric approach, controlling and testing every element, and you guys are just opening it up to the whole community. Engineers are control freaks as a rule, and I wonder whether you, as engineers, you ever get nervous about the open source approach.
JR: As new as Terrafugia may be, we believe that’s the old way of doing business. We do have that debate internally every day, of course. My head designer came up with a side vent, and I said “That’s nice, now let’s throw it out to the community and see if we come up with an idea that you like even better,” and guess what, we did find an idea he liked better. Now, I like what Terrafugia has done—I am a pilot, and I understand the rigors and the tolerances. Making an open source program part of the development of the first roadable aircraft would probably be a mistake for them. But it’s the right thing for us. Everyone talks about Tesla as a new American car company, but Tesla had Lotus make their car, and Fisker is having Magna International make theirs. Neither of them do what we do, which is outsource the design. I want us all to succeed—I just think they are going to need hundreds of millions of dollars to do it.
X: You probably saw another piece of vehicle news this weekend came from Segway and GM—they’re showing off a two-wheel, two-seater vehicle called the P.U.M.A. What was your reaction to that? It struck me, frankly, as GM’s attempt to cloak themselves in the aura of innovation that surrounds Segway.
JR: I know Segway very well, and know the team internally. I think the P.U.M.A. concept is something that’s fun, it’s to enlighten people’s minds. But GM is grasping at straws. The whole idea of an electric vehicle is great, but for the cost of all the engineering, you could just as easily achieve a vehicle with three wheels, and you wouldn’t need the self-balancing technology. I look at it as a very expensive toy. Segway developed a four-wheel vehicle that made a lot of sense—the Centaur. It was very sexy and attractive. But it didn’t take advantage of their self-balancing technology as much as they would have liked, so they didn’t continue with it. But that was the one I liked. The P.U.M.A. announcement does not mean that much from a consumer perspective.
X: You talked about finalizing the design for the Rally Fighter, and you talked about the micro-factories. What other company milestones should we be on the lookout for this year?
JR: Those are the two big things. Another thing you see very soon is the ability for a customer to come to our site and place an order for the Rally Fighter. You will see an announcement about the micro-factory, and you will see the Rally Fighter finished and announced. We will do that in November at the Specialty Equipment Market Association show in Las Vegas. Then we will go down to Baja and try it in the desert.
X: Speaking of the desert…that reminds me about feedback I heard from a few readers of my December article, who were puzzled why your company chose an off-road desert racing car as its first vehicle, given that you also talk a lot about your green aspirations, and making cars lighter and more fuel-efficient.
JR: We try to keep our eye on the bigger prize, which is that we need to provide options to the automotive market that will change the face of car and light truck consumption. If you are a large company you have the clout in the market to change customer behavior, but we can’t. We have to work with existing customer behaviors to become successful. When people criticize us about “Why would you start here, it’s not really green,” I say, well, you try starting your own company and seeing whether your green car would be bought by customers, or whether it’s better to launch first into the enthusiast market. We are working within consumers’ existing preferences, and trying to make a lighter-weight, cleaner platform at the same time. That will help us get the company launched.
X: So do you think the design for Local Motor’s second production vehicle will be something that’s more obviously green?
JR: I do. We’d like very much for the Boston Bullet or something like that to be the next model. We’d like to bring the price point down a little bit, and make it more of a city vehicle. But I appreciate the concern you’re raising. We are all trying to figure out better ways of doing things. It’s very difficult to start a car company. That isn’t to excuse anyone from anything, but you need to take all the factors into consideration. I, more than anyone, would love to see an electric vehicle launched that would make sense as a commuter car—and I think we will be one of the first companies that can actually bring it out. But I think there are still very real technological obstacles. The battery technology, for example, is not there. If you use the best lithium-ion chemistry out there, there is no way right now to get a battery that will last for 80 miles for under $20,000, and when you stack a whole car on top of that, you are looking at a minimum of $50,000. But we have got to be ready in two years to make that car. And I think that everybody can wait for two years.
Trending on Xconomy
By posting a comment, you agree to our terms and conditions.