<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill to End Non-Compete Agreements Filed on Beacon Hill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/01/12/bill-to-end-non-compete-agreements-filed-on-beacon-hill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/01/12/bill-to-end-non-compete-agreements-filed-on-beacon-hill/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Non-Competes and Confidentiality Agreements &#124; Massachusetts Business Lawyer &#124; The Business Law Blog The Business Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/01/12/bill-to-end-non-compete-agreements-filed-on-beacon-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-209580</link>
		<dc:creator>Non-Competes and Confidentiality Agreements &#124; Massachusetts Business Lawyer &#124; The Business Law Blog The Business Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=8382#comment-209580</guid>
		<description>[...] freedom of contract.  Other states have adopted similar laws, and even Massachusetts is considering changing its laws to be closer to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] freedom of contract.  Other states have adopted similar laws, and even Massachusetts is considering changing its laws to be closer to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xyz</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/01/12/bill-to-end-non-compete-agreements-filed-on-beacon-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-120943</link>
		<dc:creator>xyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 03:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=8382#comment-120943</guid>
		<description>where we work [employer is  private company] take advantage of Visa status  [h1b visa] of  employee and the NOn Compete agreement  and make all employee to work extra 2- 4 hours a daily  and he literally hell at the employee and ask them to work on weekends . Called weekend project if not you wont get bonus or salary wont be hiked .what happens if we join the competation company  which we wont mind for less salary instead of we get helling and to put extra hours and stress /health .he  has lawyer and treaten employee and employee dont have money to spend on lawyer.
what do you do this type of employer ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where we work [employer is  private company] take advantage of Visa status  [h1b visa] of  employee and the NOn Compete agreement  and make all employee to work extra 2- 4 hours a daily  and he literally hell at the employee and ask them to work on weekends . Called weekend project if not you wont get bonus or salary wont be hiked .what happens if we join the competation company  which we wont mind for less salary instead of we get helling and to put extra hours and stress /health .he  has lawyer and treaten employee and employee dont have money to spend on lawyer.<br />
what do you do this type of employer ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In the defense of employee non-compete agreements &#171; Hype Cycles</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/01/12/bill-to-end-non-compete-agreements-filed-on-beacon-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-70005</link>
		<dc:creator>In the defense of employee non-compete agreements &#171; Hype Cycles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=8382#comment-70005</guid>
		<description>[...] recently, Wade Roush wrote in xonomy Boston that, &#8220;Massachusetts Representative Will Brownsberger filed a bill today calling on the state [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently, Wade Roush wrote in xonomy Boston that, “Massachusetts Representative Will Brownsberger filed a bill today calling on the state [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Teubner</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/01/12/bill-to-end-non-compete-agreements-filed-on-beacon-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-62631</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Teubner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=8382#comment-62631</guid>
		<description>I need some advice as I just started a catering business that does the same thing as the last company I worked for.  The issue is that the owner of that company was terrible with people, her employees and especially her clientel.  Now her old clients want to go with me because I can give them a higher quality food at a cheaper price and offer more services.  If they don&#039;t like her and her way of doing business, that still means I could get sued if I sign a contract with them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need some advice as I just started a catering business that does the same thing as the last company I worked for.  The issue is that the owner of that company was terrible with people, her employees and especially her clientel.  Now her old clients want to go with me because I can give them a higher quality food at a cheaper price and offer more services.  If they don’t like her and her way of doing business, that still means I could get sued if I sign a contract with them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/01/12/bill-to-end-non-compete-agreements-filed-on-beacon-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-52098</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=8382#comment-52098</guid>
		<description>Hi I am currently in a non-compete situation. I am just a average blue collar worker with good experience in my field, but under the non-compete I can not go to any competitor to work for them unless they are a 100 miles away from my current employer. My question is “Why should I be held back to make my life better when I am not a officer of my current employer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I am currently in a non-compete situation. I am just a average blue collar worker with good experience in my field, but under the non-compete I can not go to any competitor to work for them unless they are a 100 miles away from my current employer. My question is “Why should I be held back to make my life better when I am not a officer of my current employer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Massachusetts Legislator Files Bill to Outlaw Non-Compete Agreements</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/01/12/bill-to-end-non-compete-agreements-filed-on-beacon-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-46646</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Massachusetts Legislator Files Bill to Outlaw Non-Compete Agreements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=8382#comment-46646</guid>
		<description>[...] January 12, 2009, Rep. Will Brownsberger filed a bill to ban non-compete agreements in Massachusetts. The text of the bill makes void and unenforceable any written or oral contract &#8220;arising out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January 12, 2009, Rep. Will Brownsberger filed a bill to ban non-compete agreements in Massachusetts. The text of the bill makes void and unenforceable any written or oral contract “arising out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike falkoff</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/01/12/bill-to-end-non-compete-agreements-filed-on-beacon-hill/comment-page-1/#comment-45302</link>
		<dc:creator>mike falkoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=8382#comment-45302</guid>
		<description>The legislation appears to be aimed at older or poorly drafted non-competition agreements that are not enforceable anyhow.  It&#039;s true that most agreements are of this type, over-reaching to some extent, and they do have a chilling effect on ex-employees.  But Massachusetts has a well developed body of case law regarding what is a legitimate restraint. So rather than attempt to change the law without knowing what it is, perhaps the situation could be better addressed by requiring employers to hand out a notice that lists the employees basic rights- to practice their occupational skills, as well the obligations - to not disclose confidential or proprietary information of their former employer. Employers often use non-competition agreements simply because it is so difficult to actually determine whether an ex-employee has breached these other obligations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The legislation appears to be aimed at older or poorly drafted non-competition agreements that are not enforceable anyhow.  It’s true that most agreements are of this type, over-reaching to some extent, and they do have a chilling effect on ex-employees.  But Massachusetts has a well developed body of case law regarding what is a legitimate restraint. So rather than attempt to change the law without knowing what it is, perhaps the situation could be better addressed by requiring employers to hand out a notice that lists the employees basic rights- to practice their occupational skills, as well the obligations – to not disclose confidential or proprietary information of their former employer. Employers often use non-competition agreements simply because it is so difficult to actually determine whether an ex-employee has breached these other obligations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

