<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Survey Shows VC-Backed IPOs Hit 31-Year Low In ’08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/01/05/survey-shows-vc-backed-ipos-hit-31-year-low-in-%e2%80%9908/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/01/05/survey-shows-vc-backed-ipos-hit-31-year-low-in-%e2%80%9908/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:30:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cisco flipped for Pure Digital, but did VCs flip out? &#124; VIX Trade</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/01/05/survey-shows-vc-backed-ipos-hit-31-year-low-in-%e2%80%9908/comment-page-1/#comment-51498</link>
		<dc:creator>Cisco flipped for Pure Digital, but did VCs flip out? &#124; VIX Trade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=7382#comment-51498</guid>
		<description>[...] markets showed any signs of life. But with IPOs of venture capital-backed companies remaining a dream in the current environment, guess the venture capitalists decided that Cisco&#8217;s offer was one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] markets showed any signs of life. But with IPOs of venture capital-backed companies remaining a dream in the current environment, guess the venture capitalists decided that Cisco&#8217;s offer was one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
