<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wakonda Raises $9.5 Million for New Solar Cell Technology, Relocates to Medford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/07/16/wakonda-raises-95-million-for-new-solar-cell-technology-relocates-to-medford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/07/16/wakonda-raises-95-million-for-new-solar-cell-technology-relocates-to-medford/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:43:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: solar-cost-solar-homes-solar-panels</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/07/16/wakonda-raises-95-million-for-new-solar-cell-technology-relocates-to-medford/comment-page-1/#comment-40590</link>
		<dc:creator>solar-cost-solar-homes-solar-panels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=3418#comment-40590</guid>
		<description>Although Wakonda is clearly motivated in part by cost, I still must commend them for avoiding the use of gallium arsenide in their manufacturing process.  Due to its arsenic content, Gallium arsenide is considered highly toxic and carcinogenic, and should be avoided as part of any corporate responsibility initiatives to move towards &#039;green&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although Wakonda is clearly motivated in part by cost, I still must commend them for avoiding the use of gallium arsenide in their manufacturing process.  Due to its arsenic content, Gallium arsenide is considered highly toxic and carcinogenic, and should be avoided as part of any corporate responsibility initiatives to move towards &#8216;green&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
