<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fear, Competition, and Greed: A Checklist for Making Your Deal Hot to VCs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/06/26/fear-competition-and-greed-a-checklist-for-making-your-deal-hot-to-vcs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/06/26/fear-competition-and-greed-a-checklist-for-making-your-deal-hot-to-vcs/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Leather</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/06/26/fear-competition-and-greed-a-checklist-for-making-your-deal-hot-to-vcs/comment-page-1/#comment-32289</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Leather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=3050#comment-32289</guid>
		<description>Superb post.

One question. You keep referring to the applicant as the entrepreneur. In my experience, this is now a title that is given to anybody who starts a business when in the majority of cases; I would refer to them as being enterprising as apposed to an entrepreneur. In your experience what separates an enterprising individual from a true entrepreneur, if anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superb post.</p>
<p>One question. You keep referring to the applicant as the entrepreneur. In my experience, this is now a title that is given to anybody who starts a business when in the majority of cases; I would refer to them as being enterprising as apposed to an entrepreneur. In your experience what separates an enterprising individual from a true entrepreneur, if anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great post on getting venture funding &#187; Startable</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/06/26/fear-competition-and-greed-a-checklist-for-making-your-deal-hot-to-vcs/comment-page-1/#comment-24872</link>
		<dc:creator>Great post on getting venture funding &#187; Startable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=3050#comment-24872</guid>
		<description>[...] Here is the link to Eric&#8217;s post on fear, greed and venture funding. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is the link to Eric’s post on fear, greed and venture funding. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Geshwiler</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/06/26/fear-competition-and-greed-a-checklist-for-making-your-deal-hot-to-vcs/comment-page-1/#comment-21939</link>
		<dc:creator>James Geshwiler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=3050#comment-21939</guid>
		<description>Excellent post; Eric has been a front-line enterprise software salesman, so he knows how to get big deals done. An entrepreneur also should consider the influence of other stakeholders and opinion leaders in the community. Eric&#039;s article presumes you already have a general partner at a VC firm&#039;s attention. That&#039;s not always easily done, even if you are (and sometimes especially if) you&#039;re an experienced entrepreneur...they figure they know you so they have time to watch the deal evolve.

Getting other successful entrepreneurs/angel investors to put their money (but more importantly, credibility and reputation) in the deal and hence signal that it&#039;s now starting to be &quot;in play&quot; b/c they will also be helping raise money can really catalyze the process. Key, deal-making academics (hello, Bob Langer, George Whitesides and their kin) and big customers who will help you find &quot;strategic partners&quot; also can kick start the deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post; Eric has been a front-line enterprise software salesman, so he knows how to get big deals done. An entrepreneur also should consider the influence of other stakeholders and opinion leaders in the community. Eric’s article presumes you already have a general partner at a VC firm’s attention. That’s not always easily done, even if you are (and sometimes especially if) you’re an experienced entrepreneur…they figure they know you so they have time to watch the deal evolve.</p>
<p>Getting other successful entrepreneurs/angel investors to put their money (but more importantly, credibility and reputation) in the deal and hence signal that it’s now starting to be “in play” b/c they will also be helping raise money can really catalyze the process. Key, deal-making academics (hello, Bob Langer, George Whitesides and their kin) and big customers who will help you find “strategic partners” also can kick start the deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/06/26/fear-competition-and-greed-a-checklist-for-making-your-deal-hot-to-vcs/comment-page-1/#comment-21933</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=3050#comment-21933</guid>
		<description>Doug,

Good question.  Many firms like to syndicate A round investments, and therefore need to find like-minded investors.  An interested investor will try to find out who else is looking at the opportunity (therefore not creating incremental competition) but may also introduce one or two new investors that could make up a syndicate.  This creates the positive buzz and momentum...

Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug,</p>
<p>Good question.  Many firms like to syndicate A round investments, and therefore need to find like-minded investors.  An interested investor will try to find out who else is looking at the opportunity (therefore not creating incremental competition) but may also introduce one or two new investors that could make up a syndicate.  This creates the positive buzz and momentum…</p>
<p>Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/06/26/fear-competition-and-greed-a-checklist-for-making-your-deal-hot-to-vcs/comment-page-1/#comment-21832</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/?p=3050#comment-21832</guid>
		<description>This is one of the best posts I have ever read on the mindset of a venture investors.

One question.  You write, &quot;If an entrepreneur pitches a great idea to a relevant VC, the likely outcome will be positive buzz and promotion within the VC community.&quot;  Why would the relevent VC want to mention the deal to colleagues at other firms, thereby inviting more competition into the deal?  Wouldn&#039;t a better startegy be to keep it quiet and try to get a term sheet nailed down quickly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the best posts I have ever read on the mindset of a venture investors.</p>
<p>One question.  You write, “If an entrepreneur pitches a great idea to a relevant VC, the likely outcome will be positive buzz and promotion within the VC community.”  Why would the relevent VC want to mention the deal to colleagues at other firms, thereby inviting more competition into the deal?  Wouldn’t a better startegy be to keep it quiet and try to get a term sheet nailed down quickly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

