<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of the Drivable Airplane&#8212;Terrafugia CEO Responds to Legions of Doubters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:59:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-70962</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-70962</guid>
		<description>I love flying. I have a commercial pilot’s license for airplanes and helicopters.

This isn’t new; since I was a kid 55 years ago, every few years Popular Science or Popular Mechanics would have an article about some small company’s announcement of a flying car, almost always “applying to the FAA for type certification, should be delivering next year…” Next year never came.

Operating a light plane engine costs about $50 per hour just for scheduled maintenance and overhaul. That’s a pretty expensive way to drive to work or to the store! 

What about your fender-bender accident that now costs $40,000 to repair? Bumping the curb with a tire could kill you the next day when that tire needs to absorb landing impact.

The discussion of putting unlicensed people in the air is silly and distracts from the real issues. The suggestions above that an electronic autopilot would alleviate the need to know how to fly were written only by those who don’t fly. As for learning to fly, I can’t believe anybody could make a plane that is easier to fly than many models made by Cessna and Piper.

The idea of a whole-airplane parachute is stupid. Most airplane accidents happen during takeoff or landing, where a parachute is useless. A parachute won’t protect you from a midair collision. If you think you need a whole-plane parachute in case you run out of fuel, you probably shouldn’t fly.

Splash road-salt on a machine I take into the air and trust with my life? I doubt it.

I agree with the writers above who say it’s possible to make a car and airplane in the same package, but it will be bad at both. 

However, if their market really is people with too much money who will pay anything for any toy, I wish them luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love flying. I have a commercial pilot’s license for airplanes and helicopters.</p>
<p>This isn’t new; since I was a kid 55 years ago, every few years Popular Science or Popular Mechanics would have an article about some small company’s announcement of a flying car, almost always “applying to the FAA for type certification, should be delivering next year…” Next year never came.</p>
<p>Operating a light plane engine costs about $50 per hour just for scheduled maintenance and overhaul. That’s a pretty expensive way to drive to work or to the store! </p>
<p>What about your fender-bender accident that now costs $40,000 to repair? Bumping the curb with a tire could kill you the next day when that tire needs to absorb landing impact.</p>
<p>The discussion of putting unlicensed people in the air is silly and distracts from the real issues. The suggestions above that an electronic autopilot would alleviate the need to know how to fly were written only by those who don’t fly. As for learning to fly, I can’t believe anybody could make a plane that is easier to fly than many models made by Cessna and Piper.</p>
<p>The idea of a whole-airplane parachute is stupid. Most airplane accidents happen during takeoff or landing, where a parachute is useless. A parachute won’t protect you from a midair collision. If you think you need a whole-plane parachute in case you run out of fuel, you probably shouldn’t fly.</p>
<p>Splash road-salt on a machine I take into the air and trust with my life? I doubt it.</p>
<p>I agree with the writers above who say it’s possible to make a car and airplane in the same package, but it will be bad at both. </p>
<p>However, if their market really is people with too much money who will pay anything for any toy, I wish them luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Defense of the Drivable Airplane Terrafugia CEO Responds to &#124; Hammock Stand</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-62309</link>
		<dc:creator>In Defense of the Drivable Airplane Terrafugia CEO Responds to &#124; Hammock Stand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-62309</guid>
		<description>[...] In Defense of the Drivable Airplane Terrafugia CEO Responds to   Posted by root 21 minutes ago (http://www.xconomy.com)        Make the parachute forcably open pilots crash because they dont admit i also loved richard comment about being able to land on water etc rexblog com rex hammock weblog blog archive links for 2008 05 14 site designed by matthew bouchard produced by andrew        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; In Defense of the Drivable Airplane Terrafugia CEO Responds to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In Defense of the Drivable Airplane Terrafugia CEO Responds to   Posted by root 21 minutes ago (<a href="http://www.xconomy.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.xconomy.com</a>)        Make the parachute forcably open pilots crash because they dont admit i also loved richard comment about being able to land on water etc rexblog com rex hammock weblog blog archive links for 2008 05 14 site designed by matthew bouchard produced by andrew        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | In Defense of the Drivable Airplane Terrafugia CEO Responds to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. Brewer</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-51681</link>
		<dc:creator>P. Brewer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-51681</guid>
		<description>Hmmm good naysayers. I think this is a very clever and marketable concept and design. Its about time something like this came out of America. I do hope it is manufactured here and not overseas.

Its the American &quot;Prius&quot;. Sure it takes additional training. Sure you can use it every day but there really are places where the climate allows use of this aircraft more often than not. In these places it would not only be cost effective but the preferred way to travel. Places like California for example. Florida. 

Its where you start. Then slowly but surely you craft an all weather vehicle that is still fuel efficient and easy to master and fly/drive.  

One can readily see that many of the posters here did not bother to study history ... the model T did not become the Ford Mustang overnight. Years of refining the manufacturing process as well as the vehicle.

We now live in an age where computers can be used as a tool to speed all of that up. If the designers are clever enough. In this case I believe they are.

So, here you go. You want to know what the &quot;Next&quot; thing is? With the economy in dire straits? The stock market in a spiraling dive. Here it is. Opportunity knocking at your door ... and what do most do? Denigrate the idea, poke fun at it ...

Buggy whips will never go out of style ... now will they?

But some will listen, will forge ahead, make the risky investment and reap the returns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm good naysayers. I think this is a very clever and marketable concept and design. Its about time something like this came out of America. I do hope it is manufactured here and not overseas.</p>
<p>Its the American &#8220;Prius&#8221;. Sure it takes additional training. Sure you can use it every day but there really are places where the climate allows use of this aircraft more often than not. In these places it would not only be cost effective but the preferred way to travel. Places like California for example. Florida. </p>
<p>Its where you start. Then slowly but surely you craft an all weather vehicle that is still fuel efficient and easy to master and fly/drive.  </p>
<p>One can readily see that many of the posters here did not bother to study history &#8230; the model T did not become the Ford Mustang overnight. Years of refining the manufacturing process as well as the vehicle.</p>
<p>We now live in an age where computers can be used as a tool to speed all of that up. If the designers are clever enough. In this case I believe they are.</p>
<p>So, here you go. You want to know what the &#8220;Next&#8221; thing is? With the economy in dire straits? The stock market in a spiraling dive. Here it is. Opportunity knocking at your door &#8230; and what do most do? Denigrate the idea, poke fun at it &#8230;</p>
<p>Buggy whips will never go out of style &#8230; now will they?</p>
<p>But some will listen, will forge ahead, make the risky investment and reap the returns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjw2025</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-51198</link>
		<dc:creator>mjw2025</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-51198</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also a pilot and completely agree with Davin&#039;s comment. These auto-aircraft designs are not new. Molt Taylor had a similar concept in the 50&#039;s and although his design worked well the concept never got of the ground so to speak. 
We manage auto traffic with signal lights, speed limits, roads to make us follow defined courses and people still get killed. What will it be like when those physical control don&#039;t exist? You might be the most conscientious pilot in the world but it won&#039;t protect you from the automobile equivalent of a lane jumper who&#039;s late for work. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also a pilot and completely agree with Davin&#8217;s comment. These auto-aircraft designs are not new. Molt Taylor had a similar concept in the 50&#8217;s and although his design worked well the concept never got of the ground so to speak.<br />
We manage auto traffic with signal lights, speed limits, roads to make us follow defined courses and people still get killed. What will it be like when those physical control don&#8217;t exist? You might be the most conscientious pilot in the world but it won&#8217;t protect you from the automobile equivalent of a lane jumper who&#8217;s late for work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davin</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-50787</link>
		<dc:creator>davin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-50787</guid>
		<description>I have my Private Pilots and MEL tickets - most people exposed to the government regulations and weather components imposed on flight would very quickly hang up their keys. Flying/owning a small aircraft is NOT convenient. A flying car (until new hover technologies are discovered) will remain a novelty. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have my Private Pilots and MEL tickets &#8211; most people exposed to the government regulations and weather components imposed on flight would very quickly hang up their keys. Flying/owning a small aircraft is NOT convenient. A flying car (until new hover technologies are discovered) will remain a novelty. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-21436</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-21436</guid>
		<description>Hello
Im a doubter of the viability of this project. Im at a loss to how conflicting regulatins can be met. As a GA aircraft the certification costs will be huge. As a LSA with limited weight the DOT requirements will add significant weight, Glass windscreen wipers full lighting heater demist crash protection 4 wheel braking road tires.
I dont know of either a certified EPA standard aircraft engine or an Auto engine as that has FAA type approval
Has anyone seriously looked at all the regulations a project like this HAS to meet
A simple spreadsheet will answer most of the legal requirements
Im certain one will fly(EXAB) AND drive (tractor?) and will attract significant orders and deposits. Im equally certain tht the required certification to N number and fit licence tags as a production item wont happen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello<br />
Im a doubter of the viability of this project. Im at a loss to how conflicting regulatins can be met. As a GA aircraft the certification costs will be huge. As a LSA with limited weight the DOT requirements will add significant weight, Glass windscreen wipers full lighting heater demist crash protection 4 wheel braking road tires.<br />
I dont know of either a certified EPA standard aircraft engine or an Auto engine as that has FAA type approval<br />
Has anyone seriously looked at all the regulations a project like this HAS to meet<br />
A simple spreadsheet will answer most of the legal requirements<br />
Im certain one will fly(EXAB) AND drive (tractor?) and will attract significant orders and deposits. Im equally certain tht the required certification to N number and fit licence tags as a production item wont happen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike McNicoll</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-21388</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike McNicoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-21388</guid>
		<description>I have been following the development of the Transition for about 18 months.  I&#039;ve been to the development facility in Woburn, MA and I have met the principles of the company.  They are very intelligent people working from a very sound business plan.  They will make the Transition work.  I am so impressed I have ordered an airplane from them and I have invested in the company.

A lot of my friends think I am crazy, just like friends of people that invested 25 years ago in a startup company called Microsoft thought.  Some people have better vision than others when looking into the future.  I am looking forward to saying &quot;I told you so&quot; a few years from now when the Transitions are coming off the assembly line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been following the development of the Transition for about 18 months.  I&#8217;ve been to the development facility in Woburn, MA and I have met the principles of the company.  They are very intelligent people working from a very sound business plan.  They will make the Transition work.  I am so impressed I have ordered an airplane from them and I have invested in the company.</p>
<p>A lot of my friends think I am crazy, just like friends of people that invested 25 years ago in a startup company called Microsoft thought.  Some people have better vision than others when looking into the future.  I am looking forward to saying &#8220;I told you so&#8221; a few years from now when the Transitions are coming off the assembly line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Stickle</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-20891</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Stickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-20891</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Thinking about the concerns about side winds and other vehicle wind interactions.  For anyone that owns an RV they deal with these problems constantly and manage to survive.  These vehicles have large flat sides and relative light weight for the size.  They are affected by the turblent air but learn to compensate.
Thanks,
Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Thinking about the concerns about side winds and other vehicle wind interactions.  For anyone that owns an RV they deal with these problems constantly and manage to survive.  These vehicles have large flat sides and relative light weight for the size.  They are affected by the turblent air but learn to compensate.<br />
Thanks,<br />
Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-17846</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 06:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-17846</guid>
		<description>As a Light Sport is a near impossible to achieve. LS is a gross weight including fuel crew and anything else you want to take of 1320 Lbs. The current composite planes that are popular have a useful load crew fuel and all that in the roange of 500 - 600 lbs give or take. They dont have folding wings. 
Do the maths you then need road legal lighting suspension brakes transmuission steering yatayatayata
 There is a huge difference between a drivable Aerocar and a street legal Aerocar
someone really needs put a minimum legal car alongside a small plane and see what actually goes somewher towards being comparable. Wheels or more importntly placement. on a tricycle undercarriage thyhere is 1 at the front and 2 just past halfway. Most autos have a limit on rear overhang of 40% of the wheelbase. It has just a little to do with steering. Did I mention DOT legal tires or minimum braking efeect and efficiency. Or real laminated or safety glass. 
Im having a sale on rose tinted glasses
Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Light Sport is a near impossible to achieve. LS is a gross weight including fuel crew and anything else you want to take of 1320 Lbs. The current composite planes that are popular have a useful load crew fuel and all that in the roange of 500 &#8211; 600 lbs give or take. They dont have folding wings.<br />
Do the maths you then need road legal lighting suspension brakes transmuission steering yatayatayata<br />
 There is a huge difference between a drivable Aerocar and a street legal Aerocar<br />
someone really needs put a minimum legal car alongside a small plane and see what actually goes somewher towards being comparable. Wheels or more importntly placement. on a tricycle undercarriage thyhere is 1 at the front and 2 just past halfway. Most autos have a limit on rear overhang of 40% of the wheelbase. It has just a little to do with steering. Did I mention DOT legal tires or minimum braking efeect and efficiency. Or real laminated or safety glass.<br />
Im having a sale on rose tinted glasses<br />
Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abid Farooqui</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-17813</link>
		<dc:creator>Abid Farooqui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 02:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-17813</guid>
		<description>This is a LSA (Light Sport Aircraft). It will comply with Industry consensus standards under the ASTM structure. In such an aircraft, FAA red tape is kept to a minimum. The manufacturer determines who can do what to the aircraft.

I understand this concept now. Its basically an aircraft that can land at destination airport and then drive to final destination or the gas pump. I think one commenter compared it to an amphibious airplane although I think it goes farther than that. Perhaps akin to amphibious airplane that can be doubled as a marginal boat at least.

Quite feasible and doable. We get a few customers asking things like, I have all these chain stores I own and I would like to fly to this town and surprise visit them and thus I am interested in light sport aircraft. We always ask them, well you will still need a car to get you to the store, right? This is perfect for that guy.

Of course, people using this will have to be at least sport pilots. Flying isn&#039;t driving. Someone said once, if we make flying so easy that even monkeys can do it, what we&#039;ll have is a bunch of monkeys in the air. I don&#039;t want to fly with monkeys in the air. So a pilot&#039;s license is a must.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a LSA (Light Sport Aircraft). It will comply with Industry consensus standards under the ASTM structure. In such an aircraft, FAA red tape is kept to a minimum. The manufacturer determines who can do what to the aircraft.</p>
<p>I understand this concept now. Its basically an aircraft that can land at destination airport and then drive to final destination or the gas pump. I think one commenter compared it to an amphibious airplane although I think it goes farther than that. Perhaps akin to amphibious airplane that can be doubled as a marginal boat at least.</p>
<p>Quite feasible and doable. We get a few customers asking things like, I have all these chain stores I own and I would like to fly to this town and surprise visit them and thus I am interested in light sport aircraft. We always ask them, well you will still need a car to get you to the store, right? This is perfect for that guy.</p>
<p>Of course, people using this will have to be at least sport pilots. Flying isn&#8217;t driving. Someone said once, if we make flying so easy that even monkeys can do it, what we&#8217;ll have is a bunch of monkeys in the air. I don&#8217;t want to fly with monkeys in the air. So a pilot&#8217;s license is a must.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel Kosanchick</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-16979</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel Kosanchick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 20:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-16979</guid>
		<description>The automobile is a magnificent machine that responds to our desired freedom of personal on-demand transportation (compared to scheduled railroads/buses/airlines) and has changed the world. The growth/demand for automobiles has been unstoppable, despite even the doubling of fuel costs. But the infrastructure strategy of widening the road/more roads has limits. You can&#039;t pave the entire planet!!!!

 Hopefully, we are not entirely brainwashed by the automobile and unable to consider new modes of transportation, especially those that are infrastructureless (or utilize less infrastructure than existing transportation modes).  An optional carbon neutral biofueled engine for Terrafugia would make their roadable aircraft the greenest form of transportation using minimal physical infrastructure.

 
 For the past several years at EAA/Oshkosh presentations, I&#039;ve met the CEO/his wife/ committed staff of talented engineers on a mission working 18 hours a day, seven days a week. I observe a Jeffersonian technological revolution that our founding fathers knew was necessary to &quot;promote the general welfare&quot;. Terrafugia talented management team is supported by angel investors who obviously are not vested to just make a quick profit!!!  I pray that their Jeffersonian revolutionary spirit will overcome the regulators/gatekeepers and allow this great team/angel investors to reach the marketplace with their innovative product.

MelKosanchick
Sonic Helicopters
31 Old Ridge Road
St Albans, Missouri, USA 63073

melkosanchick@aol.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The automobile is a magnificent machine that responds to our desired freedom of personal on-demand transportation (compared to scheduled railroads/buses/airlines) and has changed the world. The growth/demand for automobiles has been unstoppable, despite even the doubling of fuel costs. But the infrastructure strategy of widening the road/more roads has limits. You can&#8217;t pave the entire planet!!!!</p>
<p> Hopefully, we are not entirely brainwashed by the automobile and unable to consider new modes of transportation, especially those that are infrastructureless (or utilize less infrastructure than existing transportation modes).  An optional carbon neutral biofueled engine for Terrafugia would make their roadable aircraft the greenest form of transportation using minimal physical infrastructure.</p>
<p> For the past several years at EAA/Oshkosh presentations, I&#8217;ve met the CEO/his wife/ committed staff of talented engineers on a mission working 18 hours a day, seven days a week. I observe a Jeffersonian technological revolution that our founding fathers knew was necessary to &#8220;promote the general welfare&#8221;. Terrafugia talented management team is supported by angel investors who obviously are not vested to just make a quick profit!!!  I pray that their Jeffersonian revolutionary spirit will overcome the regulators/gatekeepers and allow this great team/angel investors to reach the marketplace with their innovative product.</p>
<p>MelKosanchick<br />
Sonic Helicopters<br />
31 Old Ridge Road<br />
St Albans, Missouri, USA 63073</p>
<p><a href="mailto:melkosanchick@aol.com">melkosanchick@aol.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defending the &#8220;drivable airplane&#8221; Dream</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-16781</link>
		<dc:creator>Defending the &#8220;drivable airplane&#8221; Dream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-16781</guid>
		<description>[...] as a result caused quite a stir, when featured on Slashdot, resulting in a overload of &#8220;to the point&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as a result caused quite a stir, when featured on Slashdot, resulting in a overload of &#8220;to the point&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-16734</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-16734</guid>
		<description>For an interesting catalog of other roadable aircraft designs, visit www.RoadableTimes.com

While I&#039;ve always been interested in roadable airplanes, I was never satisfied with the necessary trade-offs, complexity, cost and certification challenges. In my case, it is greatly easier to combine my hobbies of airplanes and motorcycles.

MotoPOD LLC is putting the final touches on a composite cargo pod that allows pilots to carry a 250cc motorcycle beneath existing airplanes like the Cirrus SR-22, Cessna 350, Vans RV-10 and others. The streamlined pod attaches to the belly and includes an integral winch system to assist the pilot in loading/unloading their motorcycle. After landing, it takes just a few minutes to remove the motorcycle, unfold the handlebars and ride away.

For the folks that currently enjoy airplanes and motorcycles separately, this should provide a fun and convenient way to enjoy them together. 

More info at www.MotorcyclePilot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an interesting catalog of other roadable aircraft designs, visit <a href="http://www.RoadableTimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.RoadableTimes.com</a></p>
<p>While I&#8217;ve always been interested in roadable airplanes, I was never satisfied with the necessary trade-offs, complexity, cost and certification challenges. In my case, it is greatly easier to combine my hobbies of airplanes and motorcycles.</p>
<p>MotoPOD LLC is putting the final touches on a composite cargo pod that allows pilots to carry a 250cc motorcycle beneath existing airplanes like the Cirrus SR-22, Cessna 350, Vans RV-10 and others. The streamlined pod attaches to the belly and includes an integral winch system to assist the pilot in loading/unloading their motorcycle. After landing, it takes just a few minutes to remove the motorcycle, unfold the handlebars and ride away.</p>
<p>For the folks that currently enjoy airplanes and motorcycles separately, this should provide a fun and convenient way to enjoy them together. </p>
<p>More info at <a href="http://www.MotorcyclePilot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.MotorcyclePilot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-16579</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 01:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-16579</guid>
		<description>A wonderful idea. I really want it as bad as a spare a**hole. Its a mix that sounds interesting but will have huge developent costs  certification costs for a marginal plane and an even more marginal car. 
The biggest hurdle will be meeting conflicting requirements. Weight of the road legal bits will make it a very fat plane
However there will be a market for legal version by the too rich too many toys market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wonderful idea. I really want it as bad as a spare a**hole. Its a mix that sounds interesting but will have huge developent costs  certification costs for a marginal plane and an even more marginal car.<br />
The biggest hurdle will be meeting conflicting requirements. Weight of the road legal bits will make it a very fat plane<br />
However there will be a market for legal version by the too rich too many toys market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Every modification, even very mino</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-16571</link>
		<dc:creator>Every modification, even very mino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 01:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-16571</guid>
		<description>---&gt; Just imagine what the aftermarket lowrider guys will come up with for customization!

Every modification, even minor mods, must be FAA approved before it can be flown. The paperwork and difficulties of making even minor modifications to any aircraft other than homebuilts is daunting and expensive. I doubt if we would see many modifications, if any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;&gt; Just imagine what the aftermarket lowrider guys will come up with for customization!</p>
<p>Every modification, even minor mods, must be FAA approved before it can be flown. The paperwork and difficulties of making even minor modifications to any aircraft other than homebuilts is daunting and expensive. I doubt if we would see many modifications, if any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-16568</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 01:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-16568</guid>
		<description>---&gt; Just imagine what the aftermarket lowrider guys will come up with for customization!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;&gt; Just imagine what the aftermarket lowrider guys will come up with for customization!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-16534</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 22:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-16534</guid>
		<description>“A two-seater is nice, but I want to be able to take the kids, too.”

It still won’t stop the cries of, “Are we there yet?” It’s nice to know that you could stop at a local runway and drive to a near by gas station to answer the cries of, “I have to go pee”.

1.) This is when you perform a barrel roll.
2.) Pee out the window, if the kids are young enough they&#039;ll think its a hoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“A two-seater is nice, but I want to be able to take the kids, too.”</p>
<p>It still won’t stop the cries of, “Are we there yet?” It’s nice to know that you could stop at a local runway and drive to a near by gas station to answer the cries of, “I have to go pee”.</p>
<p>1.) This is when you perform a barrel roll.<br />
2.) Pee out the window, if the kids are young enough they&#8217;ll think its a hoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudiu</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-16478</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-16478</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see any side mirrors or a rear window for this vehicle to be safely driven on the road. Also, it would appear that there is one heck of a blind spot.

Will it have some kind of cameras built in to the extremities and several monitors in the cockpit to make up for the loss of mirrors?

What is the suspension like on this vehicle? 
Will it be enough to absorb the bumps in the road expected to be found around small airports or will it be solid like a light plane?

Will the engine in the &quot;car&quot; be capable of pushing the vehicle up to 100Km/h if highway driving is required?

I may not be able to afford one, but it is very appealing. Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any side mirrors or a rear window for this vehicle to be safely driven on the road. Also, it would appear that there is one heck of a blind spot.</p>
<p>Will it have some kind of cameras built in to the extremities and several monitors in the cockpit to make up for the loss of mirrors?</p>
<p>What is the suspension like on this vehicle?<br />
Will it be enough to absorb the bumps in the road expected to be found around small airports or will it be solid like a light plane?</p>
<p>Will the engine in the &#8220;car&#8221; be capable of pushing the vehicle up to 100Km/h if highway driving is required?</p>
<p>I may not be able to afford one, but it is very appealing. Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-16469</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-16469</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an inactive private pilot and based on my experience, this plane&#039;s features would be very attractive. One reason I stopped is because of the complications that make light planes so impractical for travel. It&#039;s easy enough to fly to airports, there are thousands of them, but airports are often small, understaffed, far from town, and with not much to do. This leads to the &quot;hundred dollar hamburger&quot;: flying to an airport, stopping at the cafe or diner for a greasy burger, and flying home. Being in the air is beautiful, you see things you could never see otherwise, but after a few hundred hours of flying you&#039;ve seen most of what your local area has to offer.

A few times I flew to my daughter&#039;s college and brought her home for the weekend. It was 150 miles away, an easy flight and much faster than driving due to traffic. Even though the college was only 5 miles from the airport, that was the hard part. I had to get a taxi, or sometimes the flight office let me use their courtesy van, but it was unpredictable and took extra time. Terrafugia would have streamlined that leg of the trip and made the whole thing simple and efficient. Now, I can&#039;t say whether the cost of the plane would make sense for a weekend pilot like me, but certainly the idea is sound if they can make it work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an inactive private pilot and based on my experience, this plane&#8217;s features would be very attractive. One reason I stopped is because of the complications that make light planes so impractical for travel. It&#8217;s easy enough to fly to airports, there are thousands of them, but airports are often small, understaffed, far from town, and with not much to do. This leads to the &#8220;hundred dollar hamburger&#8221;: flying to an airport, stopping at the cafe or diner for a greasy burger, and flying home. Being in the air is beautiful, you see things you could never see otherwise, but after a few hundred hours of flying you&#8217;ve seen most of what your local area has to offer.</p>
<p>A few times I flew to my daughter&#8217;s college and brought her home for the weekend. It was 150 miles away, an easy flight and much faster than driving due to traffic. Even though the college was only 5 miles from the airport, that was the hard part. I had to get a taxi, or sometimes the flight office let me use their courtesy van, but it was unpredictable and took extra time. Terrafugia would have streamlined that leg of the trip and made the whole thing simple and efficient. Now, I can&#8217;t say whether the cost of the plane would make sense for a weekend pilot like me, but certainly the idea is sound if they can make it work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/comment-page-1/#comment-16460</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/05/13/in-defense-of-the-drivable-airplane-terrafugia-ceo-responds-to-legions-of-doubters/#comment-16460</guid>
		<description>While I agree with the interest in a four-seater, the target consumer for this is the sport pilot.  That limits the maximum weight of the plane and limits the seating to two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with the interest in a four-seater, the target consumer for this is the sport pilot.  That limits the maximum weight of the plane and limits the seating to two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
