<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EMC: Before Acquiring, Check the Wiring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/03/21/emc-before-acquiring-check-the-wiring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/03/21/emc-before-acquiring-check-the-wiring/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:30:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: josephmartins</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/03/21/emc-before-acquiring-check-the-wiring/comment-page-1/#comment-9612</link>
		<dc:creator>josephmartins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/03/21/emc-before-acquiring-check-the-wiring/#comment-9612</guid>
		<description>Marko,

The same can be said about engineering and sales alignment with regard to existing products and internal projects. Sales and engineering should be considered upstream alongside the tech review.

But you should not wait until post acqusition to begin thinking about the technology fit. That&#039;s a recipe for disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marko,</p>
<p>The same can be said about engineering and sales alignment with regard to existing products and internal projects. Sales and engineering should be considered upstream alongside the tech review.</p>
<p>But you should not wait until post acqusition to begin thinking about the technology fit. That&#8217;s a recipe for disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkoSillanpaa</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/03/21/emc-before-acquiring-check-the-wiring/comment-page-1/#comment-9588</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkoSillanpaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/03/21/emc-before-acquiring-check-the-wiring/#comment-9588</guid>
		<description>Looking to make sure that technology fits is crucial to any acquisition strategy but should be the post acquisition integration strategy.

Not only does accounting need to be aligned but so do engineering and sales teams.  Unfortunately too often this is seen as needed but not strategic, so the acquisitions are slowly integrated, over years, with for example two product groups building similar products.  

This becomes especially critical you’re your acquiring companies at the pace EMC is going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking to make sure that technology fits is crucial to any acquisition strategy but should be the post acquisition integration strategy.</p>
<p>Not only does accounting need to be aligned but so do engineering and sales teams.  Unfortunately too often this is seen as needed but not strategic, so the acquisitions are slowly integrated, over years, with for example two product groups building similar products.  </p>
<p>This becomes especially critical you’re your acquiring companies at the pace EMC is going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josephmartins</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/03/21/emc-before-acquiring-check-the-wiring/comment-page-1/#comment-9513</link>
		<dc:creator>josephmartins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/03/21/emc-before-acquiring-check-the-wiring/#comment-9513</guid>
		<description>Sadly, tech firms are not known for thorough financial and operational due diligence.

EMC&#039;s CSD and CTRB might be novel within the technology industry but none of this is news to competent private investment firms such as Cerberus, TPG, or GS Partners.

I should add that the success of a technology review depends upon the competence of the review board. I do not doubt the competence of EMC&#039;s CTRB, but I have been both witness to [and a victim of] the incompetence of other such groups in the tech industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, tech firms are not known for thorough financial and operational due diligence.</p>
<p>EMC&#8217;s CSD and CTRB might be novel within the technology industry but none of this is news to competent private investment firms such as Cerberus, TPG, or GS Partners.</p>
<p>I should add that the success of a technology review depends upon the competence of the review board. I do not doubt the competence of EMC&#8217;s CTRB, but I have been both witness to [and a victim of] the incompetence of other such groups in the tech industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
