<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NoblePeak Collects $12 Million for Night Vision System That Exploits &#8220;Nightglow&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/03/07/noblepeak-collects-12-million-for-night-vision-system-that-exploits-nightglow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/03/07/noblepeak-collects-12-million-for-night-vision-system-that-exploits-nightglow/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:44:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/03/07/noblepeak-collects-12-million-for-night-vision-system-that-exploits-nightglow/comment-page-1/#comment-8929</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2008/03/07/noblepeak-collects-12-million-for-night-vision-system-that-exploits-nightglow/#comment-8929</guid>
		<description>Got an email from Mike Decelle, who liked the piece but wanted to offer a small clarification. While it&#039;s true, he said, that NoblePeak&#039;s germanium-enhanced chip costs about the same as an equivalent silicon chip, their optical packaging is a bit more expensive. So the total cost of the imager will be somewhat higher than those in conventional cameras. On the other hand, if they see more, you&#039;d think people would be willing to pay a little bit more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got an email from Mike Decelle, who liked the piece but wanted to offer a small clarification. While it&#8217;s true, he said, that NoblePeak&#8217;s germanium-enhanced chip costs about the same as an equivalent silicon chip, their optical packaging is a bit more expensive. So the total cost of the imager will be somewhat higher than those in conventional cameras. On the other hand, if they see more, you&#8217;d think people would be willing to pay a little bit more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
