The XO Laptop: It’s the Software, Stupid

2/1/08Follow @wroush

(Page 3 of 3)

OLPC is a learning project, not a laptop project. The XO is simply an embodiment—the best one current technology will allow, given the compromises necessary to make the device cheap, durable, and power-miserly—of constructivist learning principles that philosopher-psychologist Jean Piaget and computer-science pioneers like Seymour Papert and Alan Kay have espoused for decades, and that have long had a home at the MIT Media Lab, which, of course, Negroponte himself founded in 1985.

“There is a long history of technology and learning,” says Bender. “We and others have been working on this problem for almost 50 years. So we have a Logo environment on the XO, called TurtleArt. [Logo is the graphical programming language co-invented by Papert.] We have eToys, a fabulously rich program that is the embodiment of Alan Kay’s life work.” In fact, almost every piece of software on the XO is designed to advance the constructivist belief that learning occurs most efficiently when it’s active, social, and exploratory, with constant feedback between instructors and learners and between learners themselves.

Sugar does include some unique quirks—”things we’ve done that we’ve done because we thought they were necessary, and because we had the opportunity to correct things that were just wrong in other systems,” in Bender’s words. For instance, Bender has a grudge against double-clicking and overlapping windows, two user-interface conventions that he says are “fundamentally bad ideas” and are notably absent from the XO. But “we are not reinventing the wheel if we can help it,” he says. The operating system on the XO is Fedora, a free version of Red Hat Linux; its Web browser is a version of Mozilla’s Firefox; the word processor is based on Abiword, a popular open-source program; its streaming media player is a free version of RealNetworks’ Helix system.

Bender says his goal for 2008—aside from simply getting more laptops into the hands of students, of course—is to make the Sugar platform more stable and get the remaining bugs out. “We also want to do a better job of supporting the community, so that more flowers can bloom,” he says. That’s the main reason that virtually everything on the laptop, right down to the hardware drivers, is open-source—so that it can be shared and so that, ultimately, responsibility for maintaining the platform can be transferred from the foundation itself to the community of educators, students, and developers using the XO. “In open-source you strive to push everything upstream, because as soon as it’s upstream, it’s not your problem anymore, it’s the community’s problem,” says Bender. “That’s a great place to be. And we are trying to push as much upstream as possible, because we won’t be successful otherwise.”

Especially not once shipments scale up to the millions, and students are using the laptop in dozens of countries, including the United States. Ultimately, the XO Laptop will succeed only in proportion to the creativity that students, teachers, software developers, and education ministries pour into it—and that’s largely out of OLPC’s hands. But the flowers are already starting to bloom, on YouTube and elsewhere. (The blog for Uruguay’s Ceibal Project, whose official goal is to give one laptop to every child in the country, is full of examples like the cow video).

“Now, are we finished?” asks Bender. “No, we’ve got a long way to go. But it’s beginning to happen. The laptops are getting into the hands of kids and into the hands of software developers, and they are starting to use them and discover things they like and things they don’t like, and they are fixing the bugs, and they are supporting each other. It has exceeded my expectations, the level to which the community has engaged in the process”–and assisted in the XO’s own birth.

Wade Roush is a contributing editor at Xconomy. Follow @wroush

Single Page Currently on Page: 1 2 3 previous page

By posting a comment, you agree to our terms and conditions.

  • Alex Edwards

    How nice to hear something positive about the OLPC computer.
    I refere to the article about the video of the calf in Uraguay..
    I entered the buy1/get1. I had no problems with delivery but sympathise with those who have not received theirs yet. I bought it as a toy for my kiddy.
    But I use it to send e-m’s from my car. I plug it into the cigarette lighter socket and charges as I use it.
    The device was far more sophisticated than I expected. It has led me to experiment with add on devices at the USB ports . Hopefully ‘breaking out’ the soldering iron and making a few transducers to measure what ever.
    It was the best toy I ever bought for some one else and ended up using it myself.

    I often wonder what happened to the second one (OLPC) abd where it went in the World.

    Alex

  • Terry Roberts

    The OLPC project gives me an adrenaline rush everytime I think about it! Having been upcose and personal with the educational use of technology as a teacher, then as a school tech coordinator, it just blows me away when I think that this dream is becoming a reality. I say those who have any gripes do not grasp the real reason for this project, and cannot break free of self-centered, greed-motivated thinking!

  • Mike Stefureak

    I’ve been defending the XO vigorously since I received mine. Even though I’m a fat fingered adult (if someone wants to start a user group called the Fat Fingers please do so!) I find that I can still type at a decent speed. The hardware is a constant journey of joyful discovery for me. It took me all of one day to become comfortable with it.

    I can’t understand the negative press that the blogosphere keeps dumping on the XO and OLPC. The machine is hands down the best laptop I’ve bought! I, too, would love to know where the one I gave went but I’m happy enough knowing that a child somewhere is sharing in the joy that the machine is giving me.

    Kudos, OLPC, on a brilliant machine and project!

  • Tom McLernon

    I think that these XO laptops are an excellent tool. People the world over are generally not stupid, but a lot of them are deprived of opportunity. A lot of this deprivation is about basic necessities, but some is about new information and ideas.

    New ideas are built on top of old ideas, but there needs to be a foundation to begin with. This is going to go a long way in helping them alleviate their own poverty, and create their own prosperity.

  • Pingback: Boycott Novell » Links 04/02/2008: Google vs. Y!MS, Military and RHEL, XO Finds Love

  • slumos

    I certainly have nothing against the Sugar interface. It’s hardly earth-shattering. It’s acceptable.

    On the other hand, I would love for Bender and Negroponte to come see my son’s eyes fall when the trackpad goes crazy–again! If anything, it’s turning him off to computing.

  • Pingback: SolidOffice » Blog Archive » XO Laptop: It’s the Software

  • http://mindymcadams.com/tojou/ Mindy McAdams

    This is wonderful. Thank you for posting the story and the links. I especially like what David Cavallo said: “Nobody taught them how to do this … You can see this fluency developing, a sense of what it means to express something in video. It’s really quite articulate.”

    That is the whole reason to distribute the XO instead of some bloat-ware from Microsoft.

  • Pingback: Rising Voices » Growing Up Blogging in Rural Uruguay

  • Pingback: Global Voices Online » Growing Up Blogging in Rural Uruguay

  • http://www.apisphere.com Craig

    We received our XO at Christmas and are only now being able to discover what the laptop is capable of.

    As for the fat fingers, yep I have them, and I find working on my daughter’s computer slow and cumbersome, which is why I have a MacBook Pro. The XO is not designed for Children and adults should not expect that it will have the same proportions as adult machines.

    The track pad – no excuses here. It is does not function properly all the time and is very touchy. I am hopeful that this will be an area of major improvement.

    Networking – What an area of tremendous frustration in my home. The fact that the XO shipped without support for most of the major wireless security protocols and required a new build/upgrade was very frustrating. In fact even after upgrading to build 565 it is baffling to me that the wireless access password has to be entered each and every time. This makes handling pass phrases cumbersome.

    On the plus side, my daughter has a laptop for 200 dollars that provides, video, chat, audio recordings, wireless access, a simplistic (yet functional) interface, word processing all in a rugged enough package that I feel comfortable letting her take it to school and on field trips. The XO creates a world of possibilities for children all over the world and for that we as a community should look for ways to support the product and goals…

  • Greg

    There’s only one thing that bothers me about this article. I have a buy one give one XO laptop and the video function is limited to short clips of up to 90 seconds. If this is the default limits, how is a kid who just got an XO in third world countries filming an 11 minute video using the XO? Did the teachers and installers somehow reconfigure it to allow for longer video clips, or is something else going on here? I’m hoping there’s a simple way to change the length of videos you can record and that’s what happened.

    One of the other things that’s a little disappointing about it, but in reality most things are great about it, is the video quality of the compression and playback is a little overly blocky. It’d be nice if they could set up a more higher quality (and memory intensive) compression using resolution playback closer to the VGA quality of the stills. I did expect better video playback quality. But it’s probably not a big deal and more important for those adults using it as a toy who were sponsors in the US.

  • http://reitzis.com stefan reitz

    Nothing equally inspiring and world changing (well, in a positive sense) has come out of the US in recent (- Bush -) years.
    I actually shed tears of joy over the aproach and possibilities of this project. And I haven’t done this over the positive aspects of pc hardware ever, even though there are more “powerfull” – by powers of maybe 10 – sets alone in my basement. I enjoy their services, but I love the XO.
    I ordered my first XO late November and got it in time for Christmas. I ordered a second one just in time on December 30th, and haven’t seen anything but misleading e-mails about it yet. I understand olpc is more into engineering communication networks for small groups than dealing with a large customer base. Luckily this customer base is made up of mostly enthusiast …
    I am still running 650 and can live with the wireless setup quirks. They will be overcome by this community.
    What makes me a bit uncomfortable is (and this may be due to my spoiled Fat Finger perspective) the leaving of the “everything is a file” predicament in sugar. I’d love to have a way putting and getting files from where I want without going to the terminal (- I like GUIs – by the way, enabling samba would be nice, too).
    I am very much looking forward to getting the second XO, just to get a first impression how the mesh networking works. And to go show them off with my daughter at our local hotspots :)

    I also wish the active antennas for the XS (= “School”) Server wouldn’t be quite as proprietary and scarce. I’d love to set a server up in my basement using standard (cisco / artem / belkin / …) pcmcia or usb wirelss devices, just to fool around with it and maybe once I got it running (maybe with dansguardian content filtering implemented) donate it to our local school system.

    Again: I LOVE the project.

  • Carl Linden

    He used a $100 COMPUTER to take video!! Same as with a cheap phone, or camcorder…. Now if they had learned the procedure, or any other relevant information, FROM access provided by their computer (again cell phone accessible) — THAT might have been interesting!
    I think a searchable DVD, AND a cheap (could be <~$35) DVD player (obviously with screen) could do 3-10 times MORE, for the same money, as the OLPC ever will! DVD’s containing OLPC OS AND content(s) would be almost trivially cheap! Most DVD players ALREADY have a nice CPU, small case, display, etc! Just add a dual PS2/USB keyboard/mouse port/hub (802/NNNbT is just a USB device away!), a little software, and voila! As the OLPC tenets say, “The XO is simply an embodiment—the best one current technology will allow”.

  • Trimtab

    To Carl Linden:

    - The OLPC shoots video at 4 times the resolution of most cell phones.

    A DVD player is not substitute for an XO lpatop.

    - a DVD player does not run for 8 hours on a battery.
    - it needs a separate display device that requires even more power.
    - DVDs cannot be viewed in full sunlight
    - breaks/fails easily in dusty or wet environments.
    - fails when dropped.
    - is NOT expandable.
    - Software and information (content) cannot be shared between players.

    The OLPC XO is a complete, personal, editable, device that allows users to create, share and distribute all content they create or obtain from others. Groups of users can also collaborate with each other via their XO laptops.

    A DVD player is fixed read-only device that does not allow collaboration. It is nothing, but a device for consumers of media content.

    BTW, you can add a DVD player to an OLPC via a USB cable if that is what you really want.

  • Gene Cavanaugh

    I think the point that many people miss is that this is NOT a laptop that will or should please YOU! It is a learning tool for underpriviliged children, and a very good one, from what I see.
    I understand the flak the project gets from industry; there is a conception in corporate America among the top managers that “what is good for our stockholders is good for the world”, and it is arguably not good for the stockholders if even one laptop is given away that would otherwise be purchased from their corporation. That does NOT speak ill of the program, IMHO. Judge for yourself about corporate America!

  • Rashed Khalid

    I think the OLPC is an excellent project,and I wish it all the success.
    It is a great way for children to learn and enjoy the benefits of computer techonology.Living in a developing country myself ie Pakistan, I know that making school learning interesting for kids is a challenge, and I hope that the XO laptop will be beneficial in this regard.

  • http://x14n.org christian gunning

    (btw, i’m not sure the trolls are worth answering – the angry reply is what they want… good points nonetheless)

    OLPC got hardware out the door (relatively) admirably, i.e. no **major** delays, recalls, etc. Looking at the game console / commercial operating system release delays of recent years, this was no small feat, and for a non-profit to boot.

    The initial sugar releases were almost unbearably unpolished (think windows 3.1, dos, and early mozilla). The initial design group was relatively small, which led to lots of bugs and a few, in my humble opinion, flawed design decisions (journal vs. filesystem should be more cooperative, rather than mutually exclusive). These issues were irksome but, hey! It’s software, so it can be updated, and it’s open-source, so i can participate. The G1G1 was pure genious in terms of getting a few thousand fat fingered, techno-lusty linux-heads like me to pitch in with bug squashing, documenting, etc. etc. etc.

    Now if I could just get that swap partition working!!

  • john blangiardo

    I love the XO!!! I contributed 3 through G1G1. I’ll share my gifts with my two grandkids and keep one for the kid in me. I added a USB Ethernet adapter to improve the internet connection for big downloads. I’m learning the Linux OS. I now am witness to the excitement of the free/open source software community. I’m replacing VISTA with Ubuntu (slowly). The educational value of the installed and soon to be developed XO activities and software are incredible. The OLPC project will prove to be one of those technology revolutions as was arpanet, Netscape, GUI, As Easy As, and so.

    My sincere thanks and appreciation to everyone at OLPC who made this possible.

  • Generalludd

    I have had two XOs since January and have not done nearly as much as i would have liked. As far as fat fingers are concerned, just plug an Apple USB Keyboard and mouse into it and you’ll have no problem.

    I think there is a way to extend the video record time via some terminal commands. I am not knowledgeable enough and can’t find a comprehensive guide to Terminal and SU (bash 32) commands to do it without copying what someone else has done.

    This is not a Mac Laptop pro or a 2ghz processor. It does what it is supposed to do. Read the comments about the laptops in Peru.

    Regards

  • Pingback: OLPC XO etc » Blog Archive » Xconomy sur le XO et son rôle

  • Pingback: RichardCravy.com » The XO Computer: Using It

  • Howard Plumley

    Wonderful article – too bad it was surrounded by notices of Microsoft’s ‘win’. The OLPC can now come with a version of XP, BUT only in foreign countries. And by the way that ‘mesh’ thing had to go. The new innovative and intuitive interface won’t work on XP. Eight hours battery time, not when you are using ‘office’. So it really WAS the software. Sorry!

  • Miiu

    I have been impressed with this device since it arrived. Opened box – sighed, “Oh how cute”. My has that changed. Added another one to the mix and got a friend to do the same.

    I had a daughter who clicked her way thru info, and now she is DEFINING it. She is very excited to know a whole set of other children her age, that didn’t have a voice, can now be heard.

    After playing around and watching my daughter play around some more we came to the following conclusion:

    Her mouse pad would get jiggly only if she left her hands on it when booting up or starting a new activity. Hands off during the process and no more skitty mouse.