<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IRobot Seeks Sanctions Against Robotic FX in Alabama Case; In Other News, the DeLorean Has at Least Two Remaining Fans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/11/12/irobot-seeks-sanctions-against-robotic-fx-in-alabama-case-in-other-news-the-delorean-has-at-least-two-remaining-fans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/11/12/irobot-seeks-sanctions-against-robotic-fx-in-alabama-case-in-other-news-the-delorean-has-at-least-two-remaining-fans/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:14:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huh??</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/11/12/irobot-seeks-sanctions-against-robotic-fx-in-alabama-case-in-other-news-the-delorean-has-at-least-two-remaining-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-5192</link>
		<dc:creator>Huh??</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2007/11/12/irobot-seeks-sanctions-against-robotic-fx-in-alabama-case-in-other-news-the-delorean-has-at-least-two-remaining-fans/#comment-5192</guid>
		<description>I guess our soldiers won&#039;t get their badly needed robots any time soon.  So much for protecting our soldiers!  Sounds like &quot;we are happy to protect our soldiers as long as we get  paid&quot;.  How much is a &quot;warfighter&quot; worth? - obviously less than losing an order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess our soldiers won’t get their badly needed robots any time soon.  So much for protecting our soldiers!  Sounds like “we are happy to protect our soldiers as long as we get  paid”.  How much is a “warfighter” worth? – obviously less than losing an order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/11/12/irobot-seeks-sanctions-against-robotic-fx-in-alabama-case-in-other-news-the-delorean-has-at-least-two-remaining-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-3183</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2007/11/12/irobot-seeks-sanctions-against-robotic-fx-in-alabama-case-in-other-news-the-delorean-has-at-least-two-remaining-fans/#comment-3183</guid>
		<description>I just want to say I’ve really enjoyed your coverage on the iRobot/Robotic FX.  I hope you keep up with the quality of your reporting on this truly humorous case.

On an unrelated note, you should really consider capping your URLs at a certain limit.  You&#039;re not really getting any search engine benefit after so many characters, and the user benefits definitely run out long before these URLs do. :)  I usually cap sites at 100 characters including the root domain name.

Keep up the coverage guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to say I’ve really enjoyed your coverage on the iRobot/Robotic FX.  I hope you keep up with the quality of your reporting on this truly humorous case.</p>
<p>On an unrelated note, you should really consider capping your URLs at a certain limit.  You’re not really getting any search engine benefit after so many characters, and the user benefits definitely run out long before these URLs do. :)  I usually cap sites at 100 characters including the root domain name.</p>
<p>Keep up the coverage guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

