<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IRobot Seeks Sanctions Against Robotic FX in Alabama Case; In Other News, the DeLorean Has at Least Two Remaining Fans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/11/12/irobot-seeks-sanctions-against-robotic-fx-in-alabama-case-in-other-news-the-delorean-has-at-least-two-remaining-fans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/11/12/irobot-seeks-sanctions-against-robotic-fx-in-alabama-case-in-other-news-the-delorean-has-at-least-two-remaining-fans/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:43:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Huh??</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/11/12/irobot-seeks-sanctions-against-robotic-fx-in-alabama-case-in-other-news-the-delorean-has-at-least-two-remaining-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-5192</link>
		<dc:creator>Huh??</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2007/11/12/irobot-seeks-sanctions-against-robotic-fx-in-alabama-case-in-other-news-the-delorean-has-at-least-two-remaining-fans/#comment-5192</guid>
		<description>I guess our soldiers won&#039;t get their badly needed robots any time soon.  So much for protecting our soldiers!  Sounds like &quot;we are happy to protect our soldiers as long as we get  paid&quot;.  How much is a &quot;warfighter&quot; worth? - obviously less than losing an order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess our soldiers won&#8217;t get their badly needed robots any time soon.  So much for protecting our soldiers!  Sounds like &#8220;we are happy to protect our soldiers as long as we get  paid&#8221;.  How much is a &#8220;warfighter&#8221; worth? &#8211; obviously less than losing an order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/11/12/irobot-seeks-sanctions-against-robotic-fx-in-alabama-case-in-other-news-the-delorean-has-at-least-two-remaining-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-3183</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2007/11/12/irobot-seeks-sanctions-against-robotic-fx-in-alabama-case-in-other-news-the-delorean-has-at-least-two-remaining-fans/#comment-3183</guid>
		<description>I just want to say I’ve really enjoyed your coverage on the iRobot/Robotic FX.  I hope you keep up with the quality of your reporting on this truly humorous case.

On an unrelated note, you should really consider capping your URLs at a certain limit.  You&#039;re not really getting any search engine benefit after so many characters, and the user benefits definitely run out long before these URLs do. :)  I usually cap sites at 100 characters including the root domain name.

Keep up the coverage guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want to say I’ve really enjoyed your coverage on the iRobot/Robotic FX.  I hope you keep up with the quality of your reporting on this truly humorous case.</p>
<p>On an unrelated note, you should really consider capping your URLs at a certain limit.  You&#8217;re not really getting any search engine benefit after so many characters, and the user benefits definitely run out long before these URLs do. :)  I usually cap sites at 100 characters including the root domain name.</p>
<p>Keep up the coverage guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
