<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Asks For More Information on Venue Issue in IRobot–Robotic FX Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/09/24/judge-asks-for-more-information-on-venue-issue-in-irobot-robotic-fx-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/09/24/judge-asks-for-more-information-on-venue-issue-in-irobot-robotic-fx-case/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:54:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Tete</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/09/24/judge-asks-for-more-information-on-venue-issue-in-irobot-robotic-fx-case/comment-page-1/#comment-1453</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Tete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2007/09/24/judge-asks-for-more-information-on-venue-issue-in-irobot-robotic-fx-case/#comment-1453</guid>
		<description>Until the military contract was awarded, there was no military contract. The suit for injunctive relief was filed prior to the award of the military contract,and removed to federal court on August 29, 2007. The military contract was reported as awarded on September 18, 2007.   How can a court vested with subject matter jurisdiction be divested of that jurisdiction by events occurring after the fact?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until the military contract was awarded, there was no military contract. The suit for injunctive relief was filed prior to the award of the military contract,and removed to federal court on August 29, 2007. The military contract was reported as awarded on September 18, 2007.   How can a court vested with subject matter jurisdiction be divested of that jurisdiction by events occurring after the fact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

