<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A123 Inks Deal to Develop Battery Cells for GM Electric Car</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/08/10/a123-inks-deal-to-develop-battery-cells-for-gm-electric-car/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/08/10/a123-inks-deal-to-develop-battery-cells-for-gm-electric-car/</link>
	<description>Business + Technology in the Exponential Economy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:43:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karl Roebling</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/08/10/a123-inks-deal-to-develop-battery-cells-for-gm-electric-car/comment-page-1/#comment-6898</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Roebling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2007/08/10/a123-inks-deal-to-develop-battery-cells-for-gm-electric-car/#comment-6898</guid>
		<description>A shift to powering cars with domestically-produced energy would benefit consumers &amp; the economy tremendously. I wonder if 1) a political system that runs on loose money, in a world where most loose money is controlled by foreign energy producers, will allow such a change. And 2), if carrying heavy, toxic batteries around in cars that run 99% of the time next to existing power lines is prudent. Isn&#039;t a modernized-for-safety third-rail system of powering electric vehicles called for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A shift to powering cars with domestically-produced energy would benefit consumers &amp; the economy tremendously. I wonder if 1) a political system that runs on loose money, in a world where most loose money is controlled by foreign energy producers, will allow such a change. And 2), if carrying heavy, toxic batteries around in cars that run 99% of the time next to existing power lines is prudent. Isn&#8217;t a modernized-for-safety third-rail system of powering electric vehicles called for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Shalless</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/08/10/a123-inks-deal-to-develop-battery-cells-for-gm-electric-car/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Shalless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 06:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2007/08/10/a123-inks-deal-to-develop-battery-cells-for-gm-electric-car/#comment-418</guid>
		<description>As, largely, a city dweller, I don&#039;t need a petrol engined car capable of over 160 km.p.h. If I could find a four seater---four doors would be nice,too---electric vehicle with a maximum top speed of about 100 km.p.h and a range of about 200 kilometres, I would be prepared to try and but it. 

Some time soon, we are going to have to accept the fact that we can&#039;t continue to rely on oil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As, largely, a city dweller, I don&#8217;t need a petrol engined car capable of over 160 km.p.h. If I could find a four seater&#8212;four doors would be nice,too&#8212;electric vehicle with a maximum top speed of about 100 km.p.h and a range of about 200 kilometres, I would be prepared to try and but it. </p>
<p>Some time soon, we are going to have to accept the fact that we can&#8217;t continue to rely on oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Beuchert</title>
		<link>http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2007/08/10/a123-inks-deal-to-develop-battery-cells-for-gm-electric-car/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Beuchert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xconomy.com/2007/08/10/a123-inks-deal-to-develop-battery-cells-for-gm-electric-car/#comment-410</guid>
		<description>This article is misleading by implying that the deal announced with A123 Systems has any relevance for the first version of the VOLT. It doesn&#039;t, although it may have for future version battery packs. Two companies are still vying to supply the VOLT&#039;s batteries and A123 Systems is just one of them. Their battery may or may not be selected for the initial VOLT , launching in 2010. Both battery developers are said to have batteries that satisfy the VOLT specs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is misleading by implying that the deal announced with A123 Systems has any relevance for the first version of the VOLT. It doesn&#8217;t, although it may have for future version battery packs. Two companies are still vying to supply the VOLT&#8217;s batteries and A123 Systems is just one of them. Their battery may or may not be selected for the initial VOLT , launching in 2010. Both battery developers are said to have batteries that satisfy the VOLT specs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
